Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ponder this: Nobody with a relevant degree has yet come forward, pointed to one gizmo or another, said "That couldn't possibly work!" and made a halfway convincing case.
I read an article from a NASA scientist several years ago that said we no longer have the technology. He said we would have to start over. Everything we used before is obsolete.
I read an article from a NASA scientist several years ago that said we no longer have the technology. He said we would have to start over. Everything we used before is obsolete.
We now have the SLS and Orion, far superior to that used for the old moon missions. Though we are going to be running more tests on these, it is only because of how we run these programs. Testing, testing, and more testing as we push the envelope just to be sure they don't miss any problems that could arise from just going with it full bore right away. But the SLS and Orion are good to go even today in reality.
So, did we have or not the technology for such a feat?
Yes.
If you want to worry about something, try looking for a topic where there is an actual question.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
