Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:23 AM
 
1,188 posts, read 959,737 times
Reputation: 1598

Advertisements

In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:30 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,428,613 times
Reputation: 40736
So, your proposal would place more weight on the votes of those sitting in their Ivory Towers whiling away their time than those of the servicemen and women who defend that right to vote putting their own butts on the line as well as law enforcement, firefighters, first responders, etc.


And you ask if that would be fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:31 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,635,782 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?
No.

Every citizen not currently facing legal restrictions following conviction should have the right to vote. BTW, any person convicted of a felony should be able to vote once they have served all of there time, meaning once they are released and not on parole or probation.

The only things I want are voter ID and to get away from the notion that everyone should go vote. Most people, although they should have the right to vote, have no business voting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Sugarmill Woods , FL
6,234 posts, read 8,450,396 times
Reputation: 13809
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?
I guess this is why you will never get elected!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:34 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,435 posts, read 60,638,057 times
Reputation: 61054
Quote:
Originally Posted by froglipz View Post
I guess this is why you will never get elected!
Or likely be allowed to vote under his proposal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
2,013 posts, read 1,430,550 times
Reputation: 4062
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?
The fairest thing would be to take away your right to vote for coming up with such a lame proposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,628,263 times
Reputation: 29385
No. Every citizen has a say in what happens.

It's often the people earning the most who are making decisions that lead to the downfall of an industry, or leading to a crash in the stock market, or requiring bail outs.

And you want to put the outcome of elections solely in their hands?

How very elitist of you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:43 AM
 
1,188 posts, read 959,737 times
Reputation: 1598
Quote:
Originally Posted by MPowering1 View Post
No. Every citizen has a say in what happens.

It's often the people earning the most who are making decisions that lead to the downfall of an industry, or leading to a crash in the stock market, or requiring bail outs.

And you want to put the outcome of elections solely in their hands?

How very elitist of you.
Absolutely, I am elitist and proud of it. Our Founding Fathers were elitists too. They believed that America should be an Aristocracy. They would be rolling in their graves if they saw the mobocracy that is modern-day America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,773,354 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?
Why you are at it, why not weight the vote by most taxes paid.

Let me know when a super majority of Congress agrees to such an amendment and then 38 states ratify it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2016, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,078,063 times
Reputation: 37337
Quote:
Originally Posted by KonaldDuth View Post
In my opinion, no one who uses up more in tax dollars than they pay into the system should be allowed to vote. Only net contributors should be allowed to vote since it's their money that is getting spent. And someone who contributes a net of $100,000 to the tax revenue should have a vote that counts 10x as much as someone who contributes a net of $10,000. Wouldn't that be fair?

^terribly awful idea

only those of us that have joined the military or volunteered for public service programs like The Peace Corps have earned a right to vote.

The rest of you, should continue to accumulate mold and dust and keep your opinions to yourselves as you plod along your selfish paths to your own shallow self-gratification as non-citizens

don't worry, we will keep you safe from the bugs out there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top