Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Comparing the stock market performance during different presidential administrations while ignoring the economic circumstances at the time is a pointless exercise--unless you're trying to deceive and mislead gullible people. But you wouldn't be doing that, would you?
Yup! Everyone here seems to buy hook, line, and sinker into this nonsense. Correlation isn't causation in this case. Any given POTUS has a very small impact the long term performance of the market. SO many other things like entrepreneurs, innovators, management, corporations, weather, world events, supply of natural resources, consumers, and natural market cycles play a MUCH larger part.
Yup! Everyone here seems to buy hook, line, and sinker into this nonsense. Correlation isn't causation in this case. Any given POTUS has a very small impact the long term performance of the market. SO many other things like entrepreneurs, innovators, management, corporations, weather, world events, supply of natural resources, consumers, and natural market cycles play a MUCH larger part.
Taxes, regulations and benefits costs have a significant impact on businesses.
Taxes, regulations and benefits costs have a significant impact on businesses.
Taxes, which originate from the House (see, not the POTUS, although he gets to eventually sign or veto) have an impact, sure. All of these idiots who say "Oh POTUS X owns an X% increase in the market" say that, meanwhile that POTUS could have signed a bill that was implemented a few months before the end of their term, and the results could take months or years to manifest.
Its the game of a simpleton to try and correlate long term market performance to that of a sitting POTUS. SO many other factors, plus the timing involved that its laughable to even try.
Here is another accomplishment of the Magic Man. The only guy who can lose money time and time again on Casinos. The guy who turns actual money into debt. The man who turns a stock market boom into a bust!
Now his flagship Miami property is declining...while other properties are doing great.
"Late last year, in a Miami conference room, a consultant for President Trump’s company said business at his prized 643-room Doral resort was in sharp decline."
As I have said many a time, you truly have to try hard to turn as much Gold to Poop as the POTUS and his family. They are business wreckers....and now nation wreckers. Yet some think this is "success"....
After all in the best economy EVER, a top notch resort should be doing better, right?
Here is another accomplishment of the Magic Man. The only guy who can lose money time and time again on Casinos. The guy who turns actual money into debt. The man who turns a stock market boom into a bust!
Now his flagship Miami property is declining...while other properties are doing great.
"Late last year, in a Miami conference room, a consultant for President Trump’s company said business at his prized 643-room Doral resort was in sharp decline."
As I have said many a time, you truly have to try hard to turn as much Gold to Poop as the POTUS and his family. They are business wreckers....and now nation wreckers. Yet some think this is "success"....
After all in the best economy EVER, a top notch resort should be doing better, right?
Golf resorts are a Trump staple and golf is a struggling business. His UK golf resorts have yet to turn a profit.
BUT having said that, I suspect Trump doesn't mind if they lose a little if the other not so 'interesting' to him projects do well.
Golf resorts are a Trump staple and golf is a struggling business. His UK golf resorts have yet to turn a profit.
BUT having said that, I suspect Trump doesn't mind if they lose a little if the other not so 'interesting' to him projects do well.
Given as his lifetime ROI sucks, I'd wonder why he want to continue the same?
Even if one is only playing the game for the game (let's face it, he never had to work a day in his life), they'd still want to claim they beat the market...or T-Bills....or other investors.
He's usually in the wrong place at the wrong time. Kushner too - who bought a White Elephant in NYC that broke him (except for being bailed out recently by foreigners)....just before the Great Recession.
Now Trump invests in Golf....just at the time it becomes evident that people don't want Golf as much anymore. What's next? Will he invest in NASCAR?
Given as his lifetime ROI sucks, I'd wonder why he want to continue the same?
Even if one is only playing the game for the game (let's face it, he never had to work a day in his life), they'd still want to claim they beat the market...or T-Bills....or other investors.
He's usually in the wrong place at the wrong time. Kushner too - who bought a White Elephant in NYC that broke him (except for being bailed out recently by foreigners)....just before the Great Recession.
Now Trump invests in Golf....just at the time it becomes evident that people don't want Golf as much anymore. What's next? Will he invest in NASCAR?
Maybe he’ll invest in Harley-Davidson?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
