Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And for the claim that pulling stuff over using a rope is too hard, someone used a ramp to drive a jeep suv up the wall in Yuma in 2012. Jeep gets stuck trying to drive over U.S.-Mexico border fence - CNN
If they could get a Jeep up 15 feet of wall a person can haul up a back pack no problem.
Then there are the tunnels that have been used for as long as there has been wall.
The so-called walls in place on much of our border now are mostly fencing they aren't the same types of walls that would be built on our border today. They are the double layered ones and they have been very effective where erected. Guess I'll have to post the links proving it once again. Ever heard of tunnel sensors? You guys act like if we can't prevent 100% of illegals from entering with a wall then it's useless even though it would prevent most of them from entering. What bizarre thinking.
It turns out the big factor was that POTUS wants 20 Billion to pay for his worthless wall. So much for all those chants and all the other nonsense.
This came from Mulvane when he was sent out to respond to Schumer.
The POTUS to afraid to come out and speak for himself.
I know you don't want the wall built and would do anything including posting misleading BS... it ain't working... Mexico is paying for the wall period... whether through trade deals that saves 20 billion or tariffs, or border fees, money gram fees, etc... they are paying period...
The so-called walls in place on much of our border now are mostly fencing they aren't the same types of walls that would be built on our border today. They are the double layered ones and they have been very effective where erected. Guess I'll have to post the links proving it once again. Ever heard of tunnel sensors? You guys act like if we can't prevent 100% of illegals from entering with a wall then it's useless even though it would prevent most of them from entering. What bizarre thinking.
I didn't see any double wall proto types in Trumps wall yard.
And when AZ put up walls, TX border crossings increased. Put up a wall, people will go around if over is too hard.
That's the point, build the wall where they are mostly likely to cross no matter where that is. Then they'll be forced to try and enter via much more difficult and dangerous areas that have natural barriers to deter them. The Border Patrol can then focus more of their efforts there.
Some people of course will managed to breach a wall but as I said before just because it isn't 100% effective but would still deter many or most of them we shouldn't build it? You make no sense at all.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ever heard of tunnel sensors? You guys act like if we can't prevent 100% of illegals from entering with a wall then it's useless even though it would prevent most of them from entering. What bizarre thinking. 
, but I don't give a rats hind end who pays for it as long as it gets built.
