Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All of them. Again, the question is... Why present an unverified dossier fabricated by foreign agents as evidence in FISA Court, instead of just presenting factual evidence?
There's a DOJ memo? Or do you mean the IG's report, which has been reported to be particularly damning?
No. I'm talking about the congressional oversight, of the actions of the Government agencies. FBI's roles partially completed, next up the State Dept and 4 more to come. The only oversight these rogue agencies get.
All of them. Again, the question is... Why present an unverified dossier fabricated by foreign agents as evidence in FISA Court, instead of just presenting factual evidence?
From the Russians. ADDITIONAL foreign agents.
This is going to blow up in the Dems' faces.
No no, not "all of them" be SPECIFIC. What did Steele fabricate? The answer is....nothing. He provided intelligence that he was provided.
Why present a unverified dossier? Because it possibly verified other information? Because it came from a source they relied on i the past? Because it was just one more piece of information along with the past where the russian spies had discussed page?
So far the only people this has blown up on is you. Someone relying on a 4 page memo to tell them what to think thats been proven to be full of lies, and written by a man who has admitted to not even reading the underlying information.
There are 5 more to come... Get your popcorn.
The truth will set you free.
More based off of stuff he hasn't even read? He admitted he didn't read the FISA documents. His staff didn't, none of them have clearance. Anyone can pull **** out of their rear ends.
If they're anything like this one... Just be five more duds.
The FISA court was aware that it was funded by a political opposition party. Even Nunes finally admitted that today.
If that is true, the judge(s) that approved the warrants should be disbarred, removed from office and charged with the appropriate statutes for official misconduct.
If that is true, the judge(s) that approved the warrants should be disbarred, removed from office and charged with the appropriate statutes for official misconduct.
Why? Should they have just ignored evidence? I mean...really? And you all act like this was the only thing used to get the FISA warrant. I assure you it wasnt. Nor was it used to renew the warrant multiple times-which requires that proof that good information came out of it.
Why? Should they have just ignored evidence? I mean...really? And you all act like this was the only thing used to get the FISA warrant. I assure you it wasnt. Nor was it used to renew the warrant multiple times-which requires that proof that good information came out of it.
Page was a non-issue to the FBI until he said "hello" to Trump during a political campaign.
The Trump campaign was the real target of the warrant.
Page was a non-issue to the FBI until he said "hello" to Trump during a political campaign.
The Trump campaign was the real target of the warrant.
Page has been on the FBIs radar since 2013. The Nune's memo mentioned a renewal of observation of Page.
Last edited by LordSquidworth; 02-06-2018 at 08:56 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
