Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're going to double the freaking labor pool by letting women work and even encourage it, wages will go down. Increase the supply, prices go down. It's common sense. The way forward is to encourage women to be women and have many many babies, stay home, and care for the home. This would solve social security as well. This is the path forward.
Incidentally, since you're thinking along those lines ... why don't you eliminate men from the labor force as well? After all, if you shrink the labor pool, wages will go up!
Incidentally, since you're thinking along those lines ... why don't you eliminate men from the labor force as well? After all, if you shrink the labor pool, wages will go up!
That leaves Kaitlyn Jenner and she’s already a millionaire
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,644,010 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by mightleavenyc
You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're going to double the freaking labor pool by letting women work and even encourage it, wages will go down. Increase the supply, prices go down. It's common sense. The way forward is to encourage women to be women and have many many babies, stay home, and care for the home. This would solve social security as well. This is the path forward.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're going to double the freaking labor pool by letting women work and even encourage it, wages will go down. Increase the supply, prices go down. It's common sense. The way forward is to encourage women to be women and have many many babies, stay home, and care for the home. This would solve social security as well. This is the path forward.
But what if women don't want to go back to the Dark Ages? What's your solution then? Chain women up in their houses? Force them to cook and clean for you? Keep them barefoot and pregnant?
Maybe we should pass laws that prohibit women from earning money, having bank accounts, access to credit and credit cards. Smart Phones, too. Don't want to give them access to the outside world. That might give them ideas.
Perhaps we can go back to the days when a father owned his daughter and could sell her to the man who offered the biggest dowry. I bet you think those were the good old days, huh?
But first you're going to have to rescind that pesky 19th Amendment or those silly little women will just vote to keep their rights.
But hey, good luck with your Neanderthal dream society.
How about whoever the highest wage earner is in a partnership remain at work, while the other becomes a SAHP once they have children?
Seriously though, this isn't the kind of country we are. I honestly don't think the U.S will ever be desperate enough to enforce this kind of measure.
OP: Incidentally, if you personally don't like seeing women in the workforce and are unable to effectively compete with them for raises and promotions, there are still male dominated industries and workplaces out there - perhaps it is time for a career change? My husband's workplace has no women in his department at all.
The link(s) you provided to support the many details for your theory are quite compelling. Hard to argue with all those facts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I honestly don't think the U.S will ever be desperate enough to enforce this kind of measure.
