Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you think this is the first time in history that an attorney has been wiretapped? There are well-established procedures in place to preserve evidentiary privileges like the attorney-client privilege.
Democrats are still embarrassed and bitter from the election that’s why all this is happening
Keep telling yourself that. I know people that went to their graves insisting that Nixon was framed. But people who are capable of intelligent and rational thought knew otherwise. The same is true here.
If you're going to split hairs between monitoring conversations vs. overruling attorney/client privilege, that question is presumably going to be settled when a court rules on admissibility - not when some low-ranking FBI agent decides to press "record" or not.
It is NOT splitting hairs. If you have evidence a lawyer is running drugs and you tap a lawyer and a dealer, go for it.
Tapping a lawyer and his client is completely different .
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
