Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-22-2018, 06:05 AM
 
11,046 posts, read 5,298,255 times
Reputation: 5253

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post

Trump used these Russian-stolen emails to smear Clinton with innuendo and suspicion at every turn.





LMAO!!!!!! You mean rigging the Democrat primaries for Hillary and how corrupt the DNC is, is innuendo and suspicion? LMAO!!!!


like Trump controls what is reported in the news and media......poor Hillary!.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-22-2018, 06:10 AM
 
24,475 posts, read 23,172,052 times
Reputation: 15075
Except the smoking gun is in your hands pointing at you and you pulled the trigger. Seth Rich stole the DNC emails, not the Russians. And he was murdered because of it.
The Russian collusion myth is still just an empty water pistol, no smoke there. Did CNN or the Washington Post concoct the Russian collusion theory? Or the National Examiner?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Just over the horizon
18,477 posts, read 7,136,145 times
Reputation: 11728
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
You should really start paying attention. Putin has outright admitted they preferred Trump over Hillary.

I doubt Fox News has shown you that.



Fox has reported that....but it's not in any way relevant.

We prefer one candidate to another in other Countries elections all the time.

Doesn't mean a damn thing as far as collusion goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,394,874 times
Reputation: 7979
Liberals are still desperate for ANY excuse why Hillary lost except the truth. They just can't stand that she was despised across most of the country and she ignored key states because she was playing up to her base in California and it cost her the election. She did it. Not Russians, not hackers, not Trump.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,339 posts, read 14,386,754 times
Reputation: 27870
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
1. Happened on Obama's watch
2. Too bad
3. Hillary still lost
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 08:58 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,280,455 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUApwyJhizQ


There are three possible scenarios:

1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.

Or

2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.

Or

3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
More blanks being shot. But the liberal wet dream lives on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 09:54 AM
 
20,739 posts, read 19,433,082 times
Reputation: 8307
When Bush was president the left loved wikileaks...Now they don't. They still have no evidence of a Russian hack. Its was probably just leaked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 10:10 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,633,345 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by beb0p View Post
3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!


Which one do you think it is?

.
I'll take Door #3.

America wins the Booby Prize!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 10:13 AM
 
51,698 posts, read 25,982,246 times
Reputation: 37958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icy Tea View Post
Except the smoking gun is in your hands pointing at you and you pulled the trigger. Seth Rich stole the DNC emails, not the Russians. And he was murdered because of it. ...

Seth Rich did not steal the DNC emails.

There is absolutely no evidence he was murdered for stealing emails he didn't steal.

No matter how many times you tell a lie, it is still a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-22-2018, 10:16 AM
 
Location: San Diego
18,764 posts, read 7,676,322 times
Reputation: 15024
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dognight View Post
OR


Kelly Ann Conway did an interview right after the election. In it she told how that they did their own polling which showed Trump doing well in certain states that he wasn't supposed to be doing as well in.
They changed their strategy and campaigned in states that usually would have gone Democrat.

Hillary didn't bother with those states. She was too busy hiding her sickness.

Your smoking gun has blanks.
^^^^^This.

BTW, anybody remember when Kelly Ann became Trump's campaign manager? As I recall, that caused a significant shift in his campaigning, speechmaking etc. I don't remember the date, but I'm guessing it was probably long before the dates of this October shift, but it would be interesting to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top