Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Except the smoking gun is in your hands pointing at you and you pulled the trigger. Seth Rich stole the DNC emails, not the Russians. And he was murdered because of it.
The Russian collusion myth is still just an empty water pistol, no smoke there. Did CNN or the Washington Post concoct the Russian collusion theory? Or the National Examiner?
Liberals are still desperate for ANY excuse why Hillary lost except the truth. They just can't stand that she was despised across most of the country and she ignored key states because she was playing up to her base in California and it cost her the election. She did it. Not Russians, not hackers, not Trump.
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.
1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.
Or
2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.
Or
3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!
Which one do you think it is?
.
1. Happened on Obama's watch
2. Too bad
3. Hillary still lost
You want a smoking gun for the Russian collusion? This is it. We still don't have proof who fired the gun, but it is smoking alright. Big time smoking.
1. The Russians stole the data and sat on it. (Which makes one wonder why they stole it in the first place). And miraculously the Trump campaign had an epiphany and completely changed their strategy. A strategy that would align with the analysis of the stolen data but their epiphany is completely independent of it.
Or
2. The Russians stole the data and anonymously dropped it off at the front step of Trump's campaign. The Trump campaign, without questioning where the data was from, bought into it 100% and started to change their strategy.
Or
3. The Russians stole the data and shared with the Trump campaign. In other words, collusion!
Which one do you think it is?
.
More blanks being shot. But the liberal wet dream lives on.
Except the smoking gun is in your hands pointing at you and you pulled the trigger. Seth Rich stole the DNC emails, not the Russians. And he was murdered because of it. ...
Seth Rich did not steal the DNC emails.
There is absolutely no evidence he was murdered for stealing emails he didn't steal.
No matter how many times you tell a lie, it is still a lie.
Kelly Ann Conway did an interview right after the election. In it she told how that they did their own polling which showed Trump doing well in certain states that he wasn't supposed to be doing as well in.
They changed their strategy and campaigned in states that usually would have gone Democrat.
Hillary didn't bother with those states. She was too busy hiding her sickness.
Your smoking gun has blanks.
^^^^^This.
BTW, anybody remember when Kelly Ann became Trump's campaign manager? As I recall, that caused a significant shift in his campaigning, speechmaking etc. I don't remember the date, but I'm guessing it was probably long before the dates of this October shift, but it would be interesting to know.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.