Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I didn't know drinking and partying in high school was a crime now.
as a matter of fact, it is a crime now, just like it was then. Or did you think underage drinking being illegal was some new Democratic conspiracy?
And of course, no one is saying that underage drinking alone is disqualifying from being on the Supreme Court. But attempted rape should be no matter what age someone was if that particular crime was committed.
Dems still can't explain how the FBI is supposed to investigate a 36 year old claim with no other witnesses besides the one guy who claimed it didn't happen and where the victim doesn't remember where it happened or when it happened.
You ask why should the tax payers pay for this investigation? Because we really don’t want a scumbag as a Supreme Court Judge for 40 years. Kavanaugh does not have the character or the veritas to hold that office.
Let’s find the true story to make sure he’s not a former/or present drunk or a violent rapist. If neither of these are true, then why not take the time to prove his quality of his present and past character?
I
Because he has had 6 background checks and been scrutinized over and over against throughout his career, and has had zero incidents in his career and as an adult, even a teen, in general. At this point unless the accuser presents any actual evidence, then his confirmation should not be held up off of such an accusation.
Dems still can't explain how the FBI is supposed to investigate a 36 year old claim with no other witnesses besides the one guy who claimed it didn't happen and where the victim doesn't remember where it happened or when it happened.
Herein lies the difference in their thinking from ours. Things don’t have to make sense or be rational, as long as they get their way.
Because he has had 6 background checks and been scrutinized over and over against throughout his career, and has had zero incidents in his career and as an adult, even a teen, in general. At this point unless the accuser presents any actual evidence, then his confirmation should not be held up off of such an accusation.
Calling for an FBI investigation in this case, where it has no jurisdiction once again shows that the Democrats have no respect for the Rule of Law.
Seriously? So the FBI broke the law on the half dozen investigations they've previously done on Kavanaugh for his other positions in the judiciary and the White House?
The FBI is empowered to do investigations/background checks on judicial and executive branch nominees and appointees. Not sure if you are actually ignorant of that, or just pretending to be, but either way, you are incorrect.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
