Quote:
Originally Posted by tillman7
I agree with Trump on this one. Young Federal employees don't want to work. All they do must of the day is look at their cell phones. Striking down Trump's executive order creates mediocrity in the Federal government's workforce.
|
I'm not a fan of that broad brush. Some are probably lazy and most probably do the best they can.
Trump signed 3 Executive orders.
The Executive Orders certainly put the UNION bosses in a tizzy.
THEY don't work at all - they get Free Space and just work on Union Stuff -- At the Taxpayers expense.
President Trump's E.O cut that back to them only getting to loaf on Union business for 25% of their "workday" ...... the HORROR!
Another E.O. forced the Unions to negotiate new contracts within 7 months of the expired contract.
Apparently -- they don't think that is FAIR.
Last one allows the termination of poor performing employees (which is rarely allowed under a Union Contract). This was for repeat poor performance reviews and gave them a last chance 30 days.
These Union Federal Employees (same for all Government Union Employees) - have Unionized against the people who actually HIRE them and PAY their Salaries & benefits. WE are the people that they fight in their sacred Union Negotiated Contracts ....... and they find us Deplorable and unworthy to dare to expect them to put in a full day's work and be terminated for consistently poor performance.
Here's the real Issue with these Negotiated Union Contracts -this is true for both Private and Public Unions. It's not just that they are difficult to fire, although that is a big problem in Public Sector Unions.
The largest problems with the Unions are their "RULES".
The Contracts should be made Transparent and PUBLIC .... People should be able to see what we are paying for and the Special Rules for the Elite Union workers that we fund.
Expect some really nasty responses -- there are a LOT of them on this board.
In all fairness - when I go into some of their Forums, there are also some that disagree strongly with their Contracts against the American People that pay their salaries/Benefits/fund their "rules"
The Government argued strongly against the Lawsuits that the Unions brought - a pretty strong argument was that the District Court Judge did not have Jurisdiction on this case [b]according to the Civil Service Act and Statute. Judge Jackson disagreed (she was appointed by Obama in 2013 and reportedly on his Short List for the Supreme Court.)
The new E.O's have not even taken place yet .... not sure why Standing was granted when the rules are not yet in place -- Judicial Activism struck again in Washington D.C. this time.