Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you listen to what the juror said after the Manafort trial you would know it matters quite a bit. They convicted on the documents and without them Manafort would have gone free.
Sworn testimony from a convicted felon who lies cheats and steals is a risk, not a slam dunk by any means.
I doubt Mueller would take a weak case of someone's word against another to court.
Manafort's lawyer didn't try to paint anything they didn't even call a witness. It was the prosecutors painting Manafort and the jury didn't buy it. The doc.'s is what the jury bought.
The documents undoubtedly helped. But so did Rick Gate's testimony and the testimony of the other witnesses. No trial is a slam dunk. But if Manafort gives testimony against Trump or his creepy offspring, it will be seriously considered.
It's not hard to be uninformed is it ? Got a link to that flip ?
Manafort gave them DickButtkiss with regards to Trump, collusion, Russia Russia Russia, Stormy Putin, Obstruction, Obtuseness, nor any other damned thing!
Manafort gave them DickButtkiss with regards to Trump, collusion, Russia Russia Russia, Stormy Putin, Obstruction, Obtuseness, nor any other damned thing!
Manafort gave them DickButtkiss with regards to Trump, collusion, Russia Russia Russia, Stormy Putin, Obstruction, Obtuseness, nor any other damned thing!
And you probably also believe that "Mueller's investigation is OVER."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.