When will the first rape case come when women claims consent was not enthusiastic?

[latimeria]

Originally Posted by mtl1

Not saying they're obligated to do anything per se, just saying it's not rape.

And if the spouse goes ahead despite objections? Do you need a different name for it or something?

[miu]

Originally Posted by Ferd

you are all going to hate me.


this entire subject is further reason to accept the biblical injunction to wait to have sex until after marriage and within the confines of marriage.


there I said it. Glad I am on this team.

And for those who desire sex outside of marriage, I recommend homosexuality... I remember how happy all the gay men were with their orgies and anonymous sex in their nightclubs before the AIDS crisis began.

There, I said it.

But seriously, men are very different from women in regards to their sexual needs and desires.

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by Cantabridgienne

Then you don't live in the United States, where marital rape is a criminal offense in all 50 of them.

In some states there has to be the purposeful use of force or threat. Not just a question of "consent".

[Cantabridgienne]

Which still means that marital rape exists and is a criminal act, whether or not you, personally, "believe" in it.

You don't seem to understand the difference between sex and rape. I am guessing you have no experience with either?

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by Cantabridgienne

Which still means that marital rape exists and is a criminal act, whether or not you, personally, "believe" in it.

You don't seem to understand the difference between sex and rape. I am guessing you have no experience with either?

No it only exists in a limited sense. I'm saying I don't agree with the Clinton administration, Clinton ironically the biggest perv President, in the 1990s pushing all the new wave sexual offense legislation in all the states. I'm more inclined to agree with the previous laws or the English common law version.