Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And YOU know he is an alcoholic how? I agree with you he was to be interviewed...NOT interrogated for a fabricated lie that the Dems latched on to.
Most humans don't take kindly to allegations of this nature. I respect his angst at this false innuendo by Ford.
His angst. LOL. His rage-crying is a more appropriate definition.
And you know the allegations are false how?
With regard to the alcoholic issue, one need only look at the broken blood vessels on his face and then also - see below. Yep, they came forward.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chopchop0
Multiple eye witness accounts from Yale where he went to school.. The FBI unsurprisingly acted like Trump's puppet and refused to interview any of them.
I think that anyone who lies under oath to any court of law or branch of government should be prosecuted. Is boofing really related to flatulence? Is the devils triangle really a drinking game? Did Kavanaugh act inappropriately towards Ford? Did Ford lie? We don't have any real answers, and that's wrong.
Yes none of the witnesses that the FBI interviewed could corroborate Ford's story. Was it four out of twenty something?
Kavanaugh's whole process was sketchy from start to finish, but the bar has been lowered in so many other branches of Trump's administration. It's not a stretch to think he has succeeded staining something as sacred as the supreme court.
Multiple eye witness accounts from Yale where he went to school.. The FBI unsurprisingly acted like Trump's puppet and refused to interview any of them.
He drank too much in HS and at Yale. Maybe he sometimes became stumbling drunk, blacked out, and was belligerent. So ???
How about anyone, one person, who's come forward with accusations of drunkenness since Kavanaugh began his professional career in 1990, especially since he became a judge in 2006. A law clerk, law firm colleague or staff, a professor or student where he taught, a lawyer who appeared before him, a fellow judge, a Republican or Democratic politician he worked with or against, a bartender. Anyone ?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,593 posts, read 12,535,636 times
Reputation: 10477
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1
His angst. LOL. His rage-crying is a more appropriate definition.
Let's see how you would react if you stand to lose everything.
Quote:
And you know the allegations are false how?
With regard to the alcoholic issue, one need only look at the broken blood vessels on his face and then also - see below. Yep, they came forward.
Whoever you got your medical degree from, you should give it back. There are many reasons for broken blood vessels on the face - just being Irish(hereditary) is one of them. Stop with the fake diagnosis, it just makes you look petty and silly.
Let's see how you would react if you stand to lose everything.
Whoever you got your medical degree from, you should give it back. There are many reasons for broken blood vessels on the face - just being Irish(hereditary) is one of them. Stop with the fake diagnosis, it just makes you look petty and silly.
He drank too much in HS and at Yale. Maybe he sometimes became stumbling drunk, blacked out, and was belligerent. So ???
How about anyone, one person, who's come forward with accusations of drunkenness since Kavanaugh began his professional career in 1990, especially since he became a judge in 2006. A law clerk, law firm colleague or staff, a professor or student where he taught, a lawyer who appeared before him, a fellow judge, a Republican or Democratic politician he worked with or against, a bartender. Anyone ?
A lie under oath is a lie under oath.
Then again, the low quality candidates that Trump has been putting in cabinet should naturally carry over to the scotus...and it has
We agree then ford's lie under oath is still a lie. Finally a middle ground.
Since Dr. Ford couldn't prove she was telling the truth, how is anyone going to prove she was lying? That's kinda what got us to this point. I mean, I'm all for an investigation, really. Investigate her claims if you must. There are only a few possible outcomes.
-- She will proven to be lying.
-- She will be proven to telling the truth.
-- Neither will be proven.
My guess is that the latter would happen since as the right keeps reminding us, the claims are from 36 years ago.
However, a real investigation would be needed where officials question anyone and everyone connected with the case without any outside interference whatsoever.
Why would they have to investigate her if they already know that she was lying? Isn't that what the FBI tried to establish? Wouldn't the FBI investigation have established that? In that case if they proved Kavanaugh was telling the truth why don't they arrest her?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
