Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't know if the Republican party is racists. BUT it does seem that the racists define themselves as Republican. Perhaps we should ask them why.
Maybe those racist democrats simply changed their rhetoric and their approach to controlling the people they once openly called inferiors. Maybe the new approach is You can't succeed unless someone helps you? Bottle them up into slums, get them dependent upon the system, convince them that they can't possible succeed without the help of the loving benefactor, the democrat party.
McCarthy and McGovern, from what I recall, barely mentioned race. Their main issues were economics, in particular both wanted a bigger welfare state, and the war in Vietnam.
They wanted black people to get access to the welfare state provisions that whites already had access to. FDR had already set up the welfare state--but blacks didn't have access to it. As the Democrats forced black access into the welfare state largess, then whites got upset about it.
For about the 5th time, the South did not become solidly red until 1994, 30 years after the 1964 Civil Rights act passed. So your 'fact' presumes that the racists waited 30 years to act upon their objection to CRA 64.
Southern whites Dixecrats who were of voting age in 1964 continued to vote as segregationists until they died. They simply refused to change their party registration to the Party of Lincoln as they died out over the 70s, 80s, and 90s. But their children became Republicans and continued to vote segregationist just like their parents.
You've been told that before in this thread.
Quote:
Also, for about the 3rd or 4th time, Republicans in congress supported the CRA 64 in higher proportions than Democrats. So your 'fact' presumes that Southern racists irate over CRA 64 decided to switch to the party that had more strongly supported it. You can't get any more gormless than that.
Northerner politicians--of both parties--supported the Civil Rights Act in higher proportions than southern politicians of either party.
They wanted black people to get access to the welfare state provisions that whites already had access to. FDR had already set up the welfare state--but blacks didn't have access to it. As the Democrats forced black access into the welfare state largess, then whites got upset about it.
Exactly. In fact, Southern politicians specifically lobbied for Social Security to exclude farm workers and domestic helpers (who were disproportionately black). Blacks also weren't able to take full advantage of FHA home loans and the GI Bill because of exclusionary practices.
Oh lord here we go again trying to hide history. Yep the Southern Democrats were racists and the facts are that those are all now Republicans which is how the South switch from Democrat to Republican and the facts that most southern whites are now Republican voters.
You can spin it anyways you like but those are the facts.
All I see is that the white racists have spread out across the nation.
Those guys marching in Charlottesville were not Democrats.
When there is a joint speech in Congress, the Repubs are solid white. The Dems are very diverse--it is pretty obvious. And just look where the base lives.
Distort D'Newsa is an ex-con propagandist. He's not credible.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.