Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seems like a good way for the White House to lose another lawsuit.
Not according to what the judge said in the last one. If the rules are published, and he breaks the rules, he can be removed and banned!
If he really DID break the rules he was given, he should be.
A college degree in journalism simply means you have likely been sufficiently indoctrinated to promote the liberal ideology, and can slant the news to reflect, said liberal ideology.
Yes, intellectual curiosity and education. Liberal ideology.
Seems like a good way for the White House to lose another lawsuit.
The Supreme Court will decide next time, as with the travel ban-
Quote:
US President Donald Trump has hailed a Supreme Court ruling upholding his travel ban which covers people from several Muslim-majority countries.
Lower courts had deemed the ban unconstitutional, but the US top court reversed the decision in a 5-4 conservative majority ruling.
The ban prevents most immigrants, refugees and visa holders from five Muslim-majority countries - Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen - as well as North Korea and Venezuela from entering the US.
He was back in the White House press briefing, and asking questions. Sarah Sanders took a question from him(Acosta) today. Some on here said he would never see the inside of the press room again, I guess they were wrong.
I have to say, I was very pleasantly surprised that SHS not only called on Acosta, but she refrained from firing off one of her rude, disrespectful remarks. The entire press briefing was a display of maturity...aside from all the lying.
I have to say, I was very pleasantly surprised that SHS not only called on Acosta, but she refrained from firing off one of her rude, disrespectful remarks. The entire press briefing was a display of maturity...aside from all the lying.
Overall, I was impressed. Yeah, shocked me, too.
Did Acosta refrain from one of his trademark temper tantrums designed solely to attack Trump and repeat DNC talking points?
Not according to what the judge said in the last one. If the rules are published, and he breaks the rules, he can be removed and banned!
If he really DID break the rules he was given, he should be.
Yeah, go after Senior White House Correspondent Jim Acosta because he asks the president tough questions. Saudis/MBS can kill and dismember a US resident with not even a slap on the wrist.
Can we please get this orange idiot and his band of merry thugs out of the White House?!
Not according to what the judge said in the last one. If the rules are published, and he breaks the rules, he can be removed and banned!
If he really DID break the rules he was given, he should be.
Incorrect. The rules must meet the least restrictive means to further a compelling government interest and, at the DC Circuit suggested that the only compelling government interest that could qualify would be the safety of the President and his family. I doubt these rules are Constitutional. Read Sherrill. It’s all there.
I have to say, I was very pleasantly surprised that SHS not only called on Acosta, but she refrained from firing off one of her rude, disrespectful remarks. The entire press briefing was a display of maturity...aside from all the lying.
Overall, I was impressed. Yeah, shocked me, too.
I agree, the exchange between them went off very well. Maybe they got together and hash things out or something, it was noticeably different today.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.