Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,394 posts, read 54,674,287 times
Reputation: 40896
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene
So the Senate Intelligence Committee and the 9/11 Commission have no truth in their reports?
I guess some are so consumed with hatred for "W" they just can't/won't bring themselves to accept some objective data/evidence. From legitimate sources. With credibility. A bipartisan effort.
Where is the factual link to the IAEA contradicting "W" statement?
You're not surprised I would require corroborating sources other than your biased word, are you?
Apparently your bias prevents you for looking for facts and your continual baseless allegations of 'Bush-hatred' are getting very stale.
And BTW, just to add another lie to the list your hero is on record as saying the Taliban had been eliminated. In the real world something that's been aliminated cannot be resurgent but I guess BushWorld exists in another dimension, or is that dementia?
EDIT: What he actually said was the Taliban had ceased to exist, the term lie still applies
Historians cant rate a current president, they are historians, and current event is not "history".
Many claimed Clinton's presidency a huge success, but now historians are looking at reality. So what any historian believes about current events is not even up for discussion.
Maybe the world just isn't the way you proclaim it to be. Bush already has seven and a half years of history that's on the record. Well, partially on the record due to his attempts to hide much of it from the public. But historians aren't waiting for the last few months of his disastrous term to peter out before they begin announcing their findings. And it's no surprise to anyone but hardcore Bushies that the verdict is not favorable.
Unlike many Democrats who "think" they know a thing or two, most people choose not to buy into CNN and NEW YORK TIMES front page headlines...Liberals don't care about FACTS...they don't! They follow their emotions!! "when Bill was president gas was under 2 dollars, we weren't at war and the economy was on fire" RIGHT?? Is there even enough room on this page to write about the trillion other "little" things going on around the world (other than Monica Lewinski!!) that ultimetly led up to were we are now? MY MONEY says you could have cared less at the time...THATS the differance between a Liberal and most other Demacrats and Republicans!! Just keep Bashing Bush, Shop at Wal-Mart, Vote for the "hope-train" engineer and all will work out! LOL!!
And Bush's statement ""I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied, finally denied access, a report came out of the Atomic — the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] — that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don’t know what more evidence we need. " which has been denied by the IAEA?
Do you think you can brush that off with cheesy allegations of Bush-hatred or might you have something factual?
Neo Cons are great at half truths.
Saddam did kick inspectors out, but in the late 90's. Before our occupation Saddam was cooperating with inspectors. It was Bush who said "It wouldn't be prudent" for the inspectors to stay, and then invaded Iraq. Saddam didn't kick the inspectors out, Bush did.
It's one of the biggest lies perpetrated on the American people, the Fox news mantra preceding this illegal invasion of Iraq. "Saddam kicked the inspectors out."
Saddam did kick inspectors out, but in the late 90's. Before our occupation Saddam was cooperating with inspectors. It was Bush who said "It wouldn't be prudent" for the inspectors to stay, and then invaded Iraq. Saddam didn't kick the inspectors out, Bush did.
It's one of the biggest lies perpetrated on the American people, the Fox news mantra preceding this illegal invasion of Iraq. "Saddam kicked the inspectors out."
People still repeat it to this day.
Interesting how you fail to mention that Saddam was not allowing inspectors in certain places (wonder why?) and was not cooperating with them many times.
But, he's "good 'ol Saddam" so let's lay off him, right? After all, Bush is the real enemy.
Excellent post about this most pathetic Conservative president Bush. Even more pathetic though are the people who support him. They are the bigger fools, and apparently the country is BOTTOM-HEAVY wich such regressives.
A liar in the White House is a bigger threat to the US than a 'murderous dictator' halfway around the world who commands a rag-tag army and no air force or navy of any consequence.
Sorry, but there was absolutely no logic in that post.
Does that mean you won't be defending Saddam like some here are?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
