Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Homeless
17,717 posts, read 13,584,759 times
Reputation: 11994

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkpunk View Post
It is global CLIMATE CHANGE, not global warming.
Oddly enough naysayers don’t understand the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:31 PM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,345,072 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by reed067 View Post
Oddly enough naysayers don’t understand the difference.
For years it was "Global Warming".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,285,880 times
Reputation: 7528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
Alas, you are correct. Even if we were to somehow stop all carbon emissions right now, we are still in for at least 2 C of global warming - very likely more. A 2 degree warmer world will be a world where many will suffer from famine and natural disasters made worse by the actions (more like INaction) of man.

If you want to get really depressed, follow the discussions of climate scientists. To say that they are not overly optimistic is to put it mildly. Right now the consensus is that we may have as little as only a 5% chance of avoiding run-away global warming. Mostly, climatologists have engaged in a great deal of what Jim Hanson calls "scientific reticence." I find it ironic when deniers try to claim that scientists are just trying to grab money by means of their published research.

Those scientists who are willing to discuss the issues candidly are often those who have retired like Dr. Hanson or have in some other way distanced themselves from academic and governmental positions where politics trumps science. If you happen to be a climatologist or an ecologist, these are times of grief. We have already lost so much and are directly in line to lose so much more - the 6th mass extinction event is already well under way.

One scientist that I follow has stated that we have maybe a dozen years or less remaining. I think that this prediction is out there, but then I go back and review the latest data sets and come away feeling that Dr. "Twelve Years" is being overly optimistic.

I'm worried about our children and grandchildren myself - they are the main reason I continue on with the seemingly hopeless endeavor of discussing science in - of all things - a politics forum. Climatologists feel a "duty to warn," and I honor them for this. Theirs is a task of frustration and dismay. But we cannot give up on our children's futures.

I actually hope that there is a hell because the executives of Exxon and BP and all the other global petroleum corporations so richly deserve to go there. They have understood the problem since the 70's and have done an outstanding cover-up job. I don't see how they sleep at night - probably they just count their gold - and the worst part is that our society agrees that profit has the highest moral value.

It's no wonder that deniers claim that scientists are merely out for the big bucks. The denier clan seems to hold nothing else of worth. Maybe our current society SHOULD go under.
This is such a spot on post. I have not come across many who hold your level of knowledge on these predictions. It's astounding that the World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice went unnoticed in the media and instead we see nothing but crap denier "news".

No one even discusses this second notice, nor pays attention to the 6th Mass Extinction alarming data, no one even knows how many coral reefs are bleached or why this even matters.

Unfortunately I will be around when the chit hits the fan and it's not going to be pretty here on earth. Deniers I hope you will be here to experience it as well. If not your children and grandchildren will be here to experience the ignorance you perpetuated and cling to in your denial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:39 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,927 posts, read 6,961,351 times
Reputation: 16509
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
For years it was "Global Warming".
It's still "Global Warming." Counter intuitive as it may seem, events like the polar vortex are actually caused by global warming - which changes the climate on the entire planet. 2018 was the 4th warmest year in recorded human history. The occasional artic blast melts like a snowball in the face of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,285,880 times
Reputation: 7528
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
For years it was "Global Warming".
Global warming refers only to the Earth’s rising surface temperature, while climate change includes warming and the “side effects” of warming—like melting glaciers, heavier rainstorms, or more frequent drought. Said another way, global warming is one symptom of the much larger problem of human-caused climate change.

What's the difference between global warming and climate change?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:42 PM
 
13,718 posts, read 9,049,877 times
Reputation: 10456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
Alas, you are correct. Even if we were to somehow stop all carbon emissions right now, we are still in for at least 2 C of global warming - very likely more. A 2 degree warmer world will be a world where many will suffer from famine and natural disasters made worse by the actions (more like INaction) of man.

If you want to get really depressed, follow the discussions of climate scientists. To say that they are not overly optimistic is to put it mildly. Right now the consensus is that we may have as little as only a 5% chance of avoiding run-away global warming. Mostly, climatologists have engaged in a great deal of what Jim Hanson calls "scientific reticence." I find it ironic when deniers try to claim that scientists are just trying to grab money by means of their published research.

Those scientists who are willing to discuss the issues candidly are often those who have retired like Dr. Hanson or have in some other way distanced themselves from academic and governmental positions where politics trumps science. If you happen to be a climatologist or an ecologist, these are times of grief. We have already lost so much and are directly in line to lose so much more - the 6th mass extinction event is already well under way.

One scientist that I follow has stated that we have maybe a dozen years or less remaining. I think that this prediction is out there, but then I go back and review the latest data sets and come away feeling that Dr. "Twelve Years" is being overly optimistic.

I'm worried about our children and grandchildren myself - they are the main reason I continue on with the seemingly hopeless endeavor of discussing science in - of all things - a politics forum. Climatologists feel a "duty to warn," and I honor them for this. Theirs is a task of frustration and dismay. But we cannot give up on our children's futures.

I actually hope that there is a hell because the executives of Exxon and BP and all the other global petroleum corporations so richly deserve to go there. They have understood the problem since the 70's and have done an outstanding cover-up job. I don't see how they sleep at night - probably they just count their gold - and the worst part is that our society agrees that profit has the highest moral value.

It's no wonder that deniers claim that scientists are merely out for the big bucks. The denier clan seems to hold nothing else of worth. Maybe our current society SHOULD go under.

You make an argument that one of my more intelligent nephews made: it is already too late.



I am still puzzled by those that claim this is all some 'liberal conspiracy', when the 'greenhouse effect' was first articulated by a scientist in 1824, and confirmed by others during the succeeding decades. The thought that our atmosphere traps certain gases was confirmed long before Al Gore, or even his great grandfather.



A year or so ago, when I was discussing how our atmosphere is a closed system, one poster charged at me claiming it was all nonsense: the Earth's atmosphere is not closed, for you can easily look up and see the stars.



Of course, such people have no idea what our 'atmosphere' is, or have any idea about the Earth's rotation, gravity, etc. They have never heard of how spacecrafts must re-enter our atmosphere at a proper angle to avoid burning up (due to the speed and other factors).


Whom to believe? Those politicians, like Senator Ted Cruz (born in Canada) that receive a lot of money from the oil industry, or those scientist out in the field, making precise measurements and comparing them to measurements taken over the decades?



Whom to believe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Homeless
17,717 posts, read 13,584,759 times
Reputation: 11994
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post

For years it was "Global Warming".
Name aside it’s happening faster then it’s supposed to be, sure the climate changes but not as fast as it is of late.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 05:56 PM
 
11,404 posts, read 4,104,367 times
Reputation: 7852
NASA reports 2018 was the 4th hottest year ever on record

https://twitter.com/NASAEarth/status...10225417637888
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 06:00 PM
 
79,908 posts, read 44,345,072 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
It's still "Global Warming." Counter intuitive as it may seem, events like the polar vortex are actually caused by global warming - which changes the climate on the entire planet. 2018 was the 4th warmest year in recorded human history. The occasional artic blast melts like a snowball in the face of it.
I've followed this for years. I support the vast majority of actions (not all) to clean up the world. I understand how the numbers were derived and they were not derived in an apples to apples manner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2019, 06:01 PM
 
21,430 posts, read 7,493,052 times
Reputation: 13233
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
NASA reports 2018 was the 4th hottest year ever on record

https://twitter.com/NASAEarth/status...10225417637888
Gosh, I saw this mentioned on the BBC website and was going to post. You beat me to it! Good!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top