Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Matt Tiabbi's report. I've quoted him many times and he's hardly a Conservative, Righty, Trump supporter or anything else one might try and dismiss him with.
He is one of the best political reporters of our time.
It's official: Russiagate is this generation's WMD
The Iraq war faceplant damaged the reputation of the press. Russiagate just destroyed it
But in the end, we all knew this would be the conclusion.
Instead of licking their wounds, finding a candidate and positions people can support the (D)'s did something as stupid as running Hillary in the first place.
More absurd uninformed comments from Individual 1.
The investigation was not illegal, and he has only his actions to blame for how it started.
trump apparently does not know the definition of illegal. Unsurprising, considering how corrupt trump is. Also unsurprising that trump supporters also do not know the definition.
He didn't invoke the 5th.
He & his lawyers demanded that all questions be submitted to them in writing. There's no legal or constitutional grounds for that.
Even so, I'm not saying he shouldn't have been allowed to do so - just that it's a privilege that wouldn't be extended to you or me.
BOLD: This is absolutely true!
Let's be real here, there are two systems of justice. One for the elite and one for us, the common man.
It goes against the entire premise of the Constitution. Nobody is above the law and madam justice isn't supposed to peeking through her blinder.
Why - after two years of investigations - did Mueller decide to state that Trump did not commit a crime and Trump is not exonerated?
He had two years plus and gave a no decision. I don't understand the point of that (other than to allow Trump to be demonized). Why not continue until you came to a decision - OR - why even mention it at all?
He didn't invoke the 5th.
He & his lawyers demanded that all questions be submitted to them in writing. There's no legal or constitutional grounds for that.
Even so, I'm not saying he shouldn't have been allowed to do so - just that it's a privilege that wouldn't be extended to you or me.
Yes, he can, and so can you. You do NOT have to answer investigators. You can demand any questions to give you be submitted to you in writing. They may not do it, but you don’t have to answer.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
