Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Think about this....2+ years the FBI, 19 lawyers, who knows how many other agents were used, 2 of the top lawmen in the United States, and they came up short of pushing the threshold of finding a crime....
This was one of the shortest such investigations ever. Yet it yielded more indictments and more guilty pleas. I think that the Mueller investigation should have continued and kept following up on the many leads, and I have a suspicion that Barr had put pressure on Mueller to close up shop. It wound down quickly after Barr's appointment which could be a coincidence, but that needs to be verified.
I think congress should ask Mueller why he chose that time to end the investigation, without even putting Trump, little Trump and Jared Kushner under verbal testimony. I think it will be good for the country to see Mueller, Trump, Barr, Mnuchin, little Trump, Kushner and the chief executive of Deutsche Bank all testify under oath in front of congress. There is a story there, perhaps several.
This was one of the shortest such investigations ever.
Yes, that is what happens with technology. Are you seriously comparing the watergate investigation and the technology then, vs. now? Really?
If not, then please inform us of what you are speaking of, and then inform us of the differences of technology...
I had thought you were one of the more credible posters here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios
Yet it yielded more indictments and more guilty pleas. I think that the Mueller investigation should have continued and kept following up on the many leads, and I have a suspicion that Barr had put pressure on Mueller to close up shop. It wound down quickly after Barr's appointment which could be a coincidence, but that needs to be verified.
Yes it did, but what did those indictments and guilty pleas have to do with the initial investigation.....sure there were some....
But if it's as great as you say....why did everything go to the state and not kept at a federal level?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios
I think congress should ask Mueller why he chose that time to end the investigation, without even putting Trump, little Trump and Jared Kushner under verbal testimony. I think it will be good for the country to see Mueller, Trump, Barr, Mnuchin, little Trump, Kushner and the chief executive of Deutsche Bank all testify under oath in front of congress. There is a story there, perhaps several.
LOL.....There is a story, but not the story that you have in your head.....and/or wish you could provide for.....if what you think to be true, then pelosi should have no problem going for impeachment.
Why is she not? Is it because she knows better, and understands she cannot go forward?
there will be no impeachment hearings. Watching Congressional Democrats tantalize these willing dupes calling for it is almost cruel. Pelosi is just stringing you along, it's fun to watch but at the same time I pity you for being so naive and gullible.
there will be no impeachment hearings. Watching Congressional Democrats tantalize these willing dupes calling for it is almost cruel. Pelosi is just stringing you along, it's fun to watch but at the same time I pity you for being so naive and gullible.
What we saw today with John Dean was the opening of the impeachment hearings, traveling incognito. Tomorrow is devoted to Contempt of Congress, and taking it to the court in case there needs to be any future action. Bill Barr started turning documents over today to try to avoid them. You won't hear the word "impeachment" in them until the time is right.
Mueller doesn't only disagree, he referred to impeachment as the way to move forward.
Quote:
The house can still impeach....why is the house
not impeaching? Notice the playing of your words....
Yep, you guys would love them to start impeachment before investigating because it would weaken their case. Pelosi is going to make damn sure that they've done their due diligence in their investigations first and not fall into that trap. But you know that, it scares you to death.
Mueller doesn't only disagree, he referred to impeachment as the way to move forward.
Yep, you guys would love them to start impeachment before investigating because it would weaken their case. Pelosi is going to make damn sure that they've done their due diligence in their investigations first and not fall into that trap. But you know that, it scares you to death.
Yes because the Democrats will find more than what Mueller didn’t with two years and unlimited resources and money. Lmao
Watch John Durham find evidence of Obama intel also running surveillance on Bernie Sanders campaign.....
Then what happens?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
