Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:54 AM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,826,842 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
He said it was against DOJ regulations. Since I don't know what those regulations are, I'll just have to take his word for it.
So you are taking Muellers word for it. That's one source. But other sources say he could have. S who's word do we believe?

"There is not a syllable in the text of the Constitution that supports the conclusion reached by either the Nixon-appointed OLC lawyer that Nixon was immune or the Clinton-appointed OLC lawyer that Clinton was immune. The foundation of Mueller’s reluctance to indict is rotten to the core."

So that being the case why didn't he do it?

Robert Mueller Was Wrong. President Trump Can Be Indicted | Time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:56 AM
 
11,403 posts, read 4,109,142 times
Reputation: 7852
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
No collusion, no obstruction, case closed... sorry liberals... I hope you got it this time... he ain't saying anything more than whats in the report... no crime!

"If we could have exonerated the president of any wrongdoing, we would have done so." - Special Counsel Bob Mueller.

But I'm sure you stick your fingers in your years and yell "la la la la la la" when that comes up LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:56 AM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,826,842 times
Reputation: 13868
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and
systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In
June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that
Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials-hacks
that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government-began that same month.
Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in
October and November. https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 10:59 AM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,826,842 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and
systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In
June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that
Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials-hacks
that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government-began that same month.
Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in
October and November. https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf
This is why high officials or anyone with a security clearance should not have an unauthorized server in a bathroom closet. At the very least they should understand what the "C" stands for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:12 AM
 
41,109 posts, read 25,826,842 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
"If we could have exonerated the president of any wrongdoing, we would have done so." - Special Counsel Bob Mueller.

But I'm sure you stick your fingers in your years and yell "la la la la la la" when that comes up LOL.
How many times was the verdict Guilty with Bill Clinton? Mueller didn't say guilty one time. Ask yourself NeutralParty... Do you really want to live in a country that you are guilty before proven innocent? Guilty before proven innocent is exactly how Democrats are practicing many people, many times. You need to seriously think about that mindset because it won't just apply to politicians.

"In the United States The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered innocent unless proven guilty"

Last edited by petch751; 05-30-2019 at 11:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:14 AM
Status: "125 N/A" (set 6 days ago)
 
12,958 posts, read 13,744,220 times
Reputation: 9740
I think the confusion is some people are not used to someone with ethics speak about something of such a grave matter. Sarah Sanders said if Mueller saw something illegal he had a moral obligation to speak of it. She herself doesn't know the difference between ethics and morals. Who could blame her it was part of the hiring process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,627,018 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
lets apply the same bar for "obstruction" to hillary that the left wants to apply to trump. lets do that - i'm fine with it. level playing field and all. he'll walk and she'll be in jail in a hot minute. maybe even hang.
Let's not. Crooked Trump is the president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:33 AM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,605,849 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeutralParty View Post
"If we could have exonerated the president of any wrongdoing, we would have done so." - Special Counsel Bob Mueller.

But I'm sure you stick your fingers in your years and yell "la la la la la la" when that comes up LOL.
That is EXACTLY what they do. It’s immature & bizarre.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:38 AM
 
Location: FL
20,700 posts, read 12,583,694 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond 007 View Post
^ Classic Dunning–Kruger effect response.

Cons here are like some Joe Schmoe struggling to understand what a nuclear physicist is saying, and since it's so frustrating for them to understand, they start accusing the physicist as being schizophrenic.

Logic like this and this is so completely over the heads of the Trumplings here that they think logic is schizophrenic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2019, 11:43 AM
 
2,267 posts, read 1,953,625 times
Reputation: 2554
Regardless of whether or not its obstruction, its FACT that Trump asked white house counsel to lie to Special Counsel about him requesting Don McGahn be fired. Uncontrovertable fact.


We have a full on LIAR in office, and it doesn't bother his supporters at all. He lies like normal people breathe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top