Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Team Obama still meddling in Iran"
And your surprised? It's pretty well documented and you can't hide it.
Obama is putting a whooping on the minds of many I see. Its been 2 years, why should I worry about Obama? Forget rent free, you guys are feeding and clothing him in your minds. Your paying him rent to live in your heads and its hilarious.
That is like tearing the roof off your current home to stick it on a home you sold 2 years ago, Illogical
What Did Obama Know About Hezbollah’s Bomb Plot in London?
...However, since they were hiding the information from their own lawmakers, it’s a question that needs to be asked: Was then-President Barack Obama ever informed that the regime in Tehran, with which he was about to sign a nuclear deal, had just been caught engaging in blatant terrorist activity in London? And if Obama was informed, what action—if any—did he take?...
We have one president at a time. If you don't like what the current administration is doing then win an election. Otherwise keep your nose out of foreign affairs. Stick to ketchup.
IIRC there has never been a single prosecution, much less conviction, under the Logan Act, which was passed in 1799. It's threatened from time to time as a partisan cudgel by both sides.
The law should be dropped or revised to turn it into something actually useful. The basic concept is fine--we do not want private, unelected citizens trying to horn in on US foreign policy. No convictions in 220 years is prima facie evidence that the law as written is broken.
IIRC there has never been a single prosecution, much less conviction, under the Logan Act, which was passed in 1799. It's threatened from time to time as a partisan cudgel by both sides.
The law should be dropped or revised to turn it into something actually useful. The basic concept is fine--we do not want private, unelected citizens trying to horn in on US foreign policy. No convictions in 220 years is prima facie evidence that the law as written is broken.
Yet, Obama/Lynch used it as the reason to spy on General Flynn and the 2 step rule. Why was Flynn unmasked. FISA? Or was it done without?(Samantha Powers)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
