Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
these are not military rifles, and you're ignoring the militia statement that i responded to.
What's to acknowledge? We all know the courts have ruled, and the NRA has spoken. I accept it.
But, there are plenty of people adverse to Roe v Wade. Should they be discounted due to ignorance of the tools used?
The doctors who treat these shot patients have said the 70% of the people who died would have lived had a regular gun been used.
So I accept that mass shootings anyplace people gather are the collateral damage to gun ownership in the USA.
I would still put money on the fact that the majority of the millions of AR whatevers and the AK 47 owners wouldn't lift a finger to help a neighbor in distress.
What's to acknowledge? We all know the courts have ruled, and the NRA has spoken. I accept it.
But, there are plenty of people adverse to Roe v Wade. Should they be discounted due to ignorance of the tools used?
The doctors who treat these shot patients have said the 70% of the people who died would have lived had a regular gun been used.
So I accept that mass shootings anyplace people gather are the collateral damage to gun ownership in the USA.
I would still put money on the fact that the majority of the millions of AR whatevers and the AK 47 owners wouldn't lift a finger to help a neighbor in distress.
Just my .02.
If the government and courts respected the Constitution, the NRA would just be providing training and not lobbying.
What's to acknowledge? We all know the courts have ruled, and the NRA has spoken. I accept it.
But, there are plenty of people adverse to Roe v Wade. Should they be discounted due to ignorance of the tools used?
The doctors who treat these shot patients have said the 70% of the people who died would have lived had a regular gun been used.
So I accept that mass shootings anyplace people gather are the collateral damage to gun ownership in the USA.
I would still put money on the fact that the majority of the millions of AR whatevers and the AK 47 owners wouldn't lift a finger to help a neighbor in distress.
I still wonder what all the gun loving folks need these weapons for?
What are they afraid of?
If they can own AR-15, I want to be allowed to own a nuclear bomb.
Unsubstantiated fear is killing us all
Guns are like guitars or fishing rods. You just can't have too many. Don't need a nuclear bomb, but would like a flame thrower!
Where is that well regulated militia that we all needs arms to enable? When do they meet? Have they determined what and who they will defend the country against? The army, FBI, CIA, ATF? a bat**** nuts POTUS? DO they have regular training sessions so they will be able to defend the country?
Funny you should ask------session tonight at my place. Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms training.
No, he said "My AR is ready for you, Robert Francis,"
That's not a threat.
Maybe his AR is ready for Robert Francis to pick up as he said his government would. He's just being cooperative.
^^^ Yes, this.....I'm having trouble seeing why anyone can take that as a direct threat? The cops will laugh it off as they should.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
