Whistleblower report released (speech, election, claims, voters)

[TreeBeard]

Maguire: "The Whistleblower did the right thing."

[OpenRider]

That was the sound of the rake handle hitting the Dems in the face AGAIN.

[TreeBeard]

Nunes just got egg on his face, the dolt. Just got Maguire to reiterate the credibility of the report and the whistleblower.

[hawkeye2009]

Originally Posted by Chuckity

(Creating a separate thread because I think it deserves it's own comments)

I just read the whole thing.

It's a very well written complaint. Not one that I would think was written by a low level person without legal counsel.

I'm also not seeing anything that may point to the whistleblower being partisan ... I'm assuming it's the actual identity of the whistleblower that lends the reporting to to him/her being partisan.

(Acting DNI Joseph Maguire testifying soon this morning ..)

The "whistle blower" is a lifelong democrat; this is just another political attack by the dems, which reveals their treachery and use of the legal system to attack opponants.


Let's see how this unfolds. Undoubtedly, the investigation will exhonerate Trump and show the whole investigation was just another witch hunt by the dems, who have abandoned legislation in their zeal to attack Trump.

[Scooby Snacks]

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks

I want to know:

A. who this person is, along with the rest of the country.

B. if Mitch Mc Connell will do his usual stonewalling tactics and just refuse to try Trump's impeachment case? That's what I think will happen.

Originally Posted by Chuckity

So many things have to happen for it to even get to the Senate - the Republican controlled Senate, btw.

I mean, real impeachment proceedings haven't even happened yet. If anyone is stonewalling, it's Pelosi.

My point exactly.

[InformedConsent]

Originally Posted by moneill

What are the inconsistencies?

Extrapolations that have nothing to do with the actual phone call discussion.

[moneill]

Wasn't one of the key reasons the DOJ said Congress didn't need to see the report was because it didn't cover intelligence...seems to be all about intelligence.

And what in the whistle blower's report seems to contradict the memo about the call that would suggest the whistle blower didn't have access to the right information.

[mlb]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

The "whistle blower" is a lifelong democrat; this is just another political attack by the dems, which reveals their treachery and use of the legal system to attack opponants.


Let's see how this unfolds. Undoubtedly, the investigation will exhonerate Trump and show the whole investigation was just another witch hunt by the dems, who have abandoned legislation in their zeal to attack Trump.

Actually, the whistleblower is a Republican.

[EddieB.Good]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

The "whistle blower" is a lifelong democrat; this is just another political attack by the dems, which reveals their treachery and use of the legal system to attack opponants.


Let's see how this unfolds. Undoubtedly, the investigation will exhonerate Trump and show the whole investigation was just another witch hunt by the dems, who have abandoned legislation in their zeal to attack Trump.

So you think people are willing to perjure themselves and ruin their careers just to stick it to it to someone from the other side?

Or are you one of those people who thinks that facts can be voided if the person disclosing them has a bias? But only if that bias is that they're a Liberal bc we know you'd never dismiss a Conservative's testimony against a Liberal bc of bias, right?

I can't even decide which is the dumber argument TBH.

[fusillirob1983]

Originally Posted by mlb

Actually, the whistleblower is a Republican.

How do you know? That'd be funny if he was.