Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-26-2019, 05:24 PM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,170,292 times
Reputation: 15551

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TBMorgan View Post
Inspector General is a Trump appointee. Investigation as well as DNI, another Trump man, said it was a legitimate case.

Take your fantasyland theory to Disney.
Unitl the president relieased the phone conversation.. try to keep up.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2019, 05:24 PM
 
Location: East Lansing, MI
28,353 posts, read 16,389,243 times
Reputation: 10467
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
He's allowed to retaliate. Whistleblower "program" is unconstitutional.
This is just flat ridiculous.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9 View Post
That's ridiculous. The person the President assigns to do the job should do the job.
First off the president shouldn't be sending anyone to a foreign country to do an investigation on corruption of his political opponent. Secondly it should be someone who is qualified and experienced from one of the intelligence agencies, and last but not least there should be some facts that a crime was committed.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 06:34 PM
 
3,606 posts, read 1,659,254 times
Reputation: 3212
Trump on transcript saying to Ukraine leader Zelenskly..."I would like for you to do us a favor" and prodded him to work with Barr/Giuliani while witholding a military package that congress approved?! Ouch...this looks very bad!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 07:08 PM
 
Location: NY
16,083 posts, read 6,853,083 times
Reputation: 12334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckity View Post
(Creating a separate thread because I think it deserves it's own comments)

I just read the whole thing.

It's a very well written complaint. Not one that I would think was written by a low level person without legal counsel.

I'm also not seeing anything that may point to the whistleblower being partisan ... I'm assuming it's the actual identity of the whistleblower that lends the reporting to to him/her being partisan.

(Acting DNI Joseph Maguire testifying soon this morning ..)


Opinion: Joe MaGuire is definitely no Mac MacGyver ! (sarcasm)
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 07:47 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Retired View Post
Opinion: Joe MaGuire is definitely no Mac MacGyver ! (sarcasm)
Joe MaGuire is a very honorable person stuck in a horrible situation, while I don’t agree with some of his decisions he certainly tried to do what is best.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 07:59 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You keep ignoring the assessment of the IG who found it credible and urgent. The IG who was appointed by Trump by the way so forget the deep state nonsense.
BEFORE he read the phone call transcript.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 08:17 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,378,460 times
Reputation: 11376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
First off the president shouldn't be sending anyone to a foreign country to do an investigation on corruption of his political opponent. Secondly it should be someone who is qualified and experienced from one of the intelligence agencies, and last but not least there should be some facts that a crime was committed.
The irony of your first and third sentences!

The second sentence is just silly. There is nothing that the intelligence "should" be asked to do, ever. They are the President's servants. If he thinks someone else will do a better job or is simply more trustworthy, then that person is the one who "should" do it. Our intelligence agencies have their own agendas and are crooked as hell.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 08:21 PM
 
18,561 posts, read 7,378,460 times
Reputation: 11376
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooligan View Post
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hbdwihdh378y9
He's allowed to retaliate. Whistleblower "program" is unconstitutional.
This is just flat ridiculous.
No, it's a basic fact. Congress cannot require the executive branch to do anything that is not spelled out in the Constitution. That's Constitution 101.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2019, 08:30 PM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,155 posts, read 12,968,610 times
Reputation: 33185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe the Photog View Post
You keep pointing out to the same thing. The whistle blower is not trying to infer that they were there. He or she clearly says otherwise. The whistle blower talked to a dozen people if I read the report right and they all said similiar things.

Again, an investigation will clear things up.

By trying to cover up the phone call and the transcrpt, the president and his administration are not looking innocent in doing that
Exactly. The truth will out. If Trump did nothing wrong, a thorough investigation will uncover nothing. So he shouldn't be worried. And Trump supporters have no business screaming "waste of taxpayer funds!" With regards to him, he uses our tax money like his own no limit American Express card.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top