Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obviously NYT seems to think it's a big deal he didn't say anything about it. So do I. It makes it look coordinated a'la Blasey-Ford so maybe that is why he kept his trap shut? The WB talked to an IC committee aide. Why didn't the R side of the committee know?
I don’t see where the NYT indicates it’s a big deal but it is a fact that he came to them first, is it normal procedure for the committee to go public with a complaint that hasn’t been filed. He referred the WB to the IG and suggested council, if it’s something greater I’m with you.
The whole “but Obama” thing is legit.
Obama was a constitutional train wreck.
If we can’t be consistent, how are we to take any of this seriously?
Personally, I care nothing about any of what’s going on now. It’s nothing but posturing. Rallying the troops. Getting people worked up over bombastic vagueness.
This thread is actually about Schiff and the 'whistleblower'. It is not about Trump.
Actually this thread title is nonsense. The aides of the committee were contacted and the whistleblower was referred to an attorney.
Since the thread is predicated on conspiracy peddling, I’d say Trump is fair game. At least that had more in common with the thread predication than the thread itself.
I don’t see where the NYT indicates it’s a big deal but it is a fact that he came to them first, is it normal procedure for the committee to go public with a complaint that hasn’t been filed. He referred the WB to the IG and suggested council, if it’s something greater I’m with you.
Is it normal procedure to lie about it as Schiff did? Please see the video I posted.
The whole “but Obama” thing is legit.
Obama was a constitutional train wreck.
If we can’t be consistent, how are we to take any of this seriously?
Personally, I care nothing about any of what’s going on now. It’s nothing but posturing. Rallying the troops. Getting people worked up over bombastic vagueness.
The time to address that was when he was in office.
Now Trump is in office and responsible for his actions and behaviors.
Oh. Oh my. Here it is. After all Trump sycophants went hours going nuts about this, it turns out that DNI Regulations actually contemplate whistleblowers going straight to the intelligence committees. Bwahahahaha what a bunch of suckers
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
