Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I live on The Westside of Los Angeles in a two bedroom apartment. My landlord is Hispanic. My roommate is Irish. My neighbor is Russian, and my security guard is Black. The people who do the landscaping are Spanish-speaking Hispanics. The people who fix the computer are Cantonese-speaking Asians.
I am proud to be able to go down the street and eat at dozens of ethnic restaurants. I can drive past churches of many different beliefs. I can see different races together in harmony. As a pretty open-minded person, I do not condone racism, nor any race related violence. I DO enjoy what makes a person unique. BUT I ask myself, is diversity overrated?
The language barriers, the gang-wars, the constant police scandals, riots, school shootings, rampant racism, groups not assimilating, and profuse illegal Mexicans who make me feel like I am living in a third world country. I wonder if my life would be better-without it... What if.. we all shared a culture and a common language?
I have visited many cities. I have seen diversity to work both as a benefit, and as a negative. In the positive society's, people are united. People share common culture, while not forgetting their past. In negative societies people grasp onto their past and refuse to unite. I think that one of the first ways we can reverse this negative is to deport ALL illegal aliens.
Truely Yours.
Last edited by newportbeachsmostwanted; 01-02-2007 at 05:02 PM..
It is only the White/European countries that "embrace" diversity and multiculturalism.
Europe, Australia, are importing large amounts of Muslim-Arabs from the Middle East. The United States is importing vast hordes from the Third World.
So, what we have is the "White World" (historically White nations) actively working so that Whites become minorities in their own countries. Whites are about 10% of the world's population; where-as Asians are 2/3rds and the Black population may be slightly larger than the White one.
So why is the "White World" embracing these failed policies that work to destroy the race and culture of White nations? Why is Asia and Africa not "embracing diversity?"
How can diversity work when it turns Europe into Arabia and the United States into Mexico?
Diversity _DESTROYS_ culture and race. Whites are a minority in the world but why is it Whites that are not allowed to defend themselves? Why is it okay for other groups to come to the White countries and work to become majorities? Why are people not pushing for diversity in Asia, Asia and elsewhere?
It's a joke plain and simple. You can't have diversity when it's just White countries that embrace it. Basically, you replace the native population with another. There's no benefit to this.
Furthermore, lets look at the negative effects. The White countries of the world, and I doubt anyone could argue against this, are responsible for the overwhelming majority of technological advancement in the past couple of centuries.
What's going to happen when we are replaced with a Third World population that never exactly advanced (technologically wise)?
Also -- in Europe and America certain "minority groups" (which really are anything but in world context) bring large amounts of crime and disproportional are spent on with welfare handouts. How are these policies beneficial? You have areas in one-homogeneous countries such as Sweden that are becoming Muslim and now have problems they never had before such as gang rape and murder.
I cannot fathom how it is beneficial for Whites to work to become extinct; where-as other parts of the world are not diverse at all. Furthermore, the increased crime brought on the native inhabited is hardly a benefit?
Europe is getting fed-up with the policies, they are having riots, murder, gangs, rape, and incredibly violence they never had before in once peaceful nations. You can only enact so many speech limitations before people get upset with what is being forced on them.
In America it's similar with the illegal aliens and the crime and gangs they are bringing. In 1970 America was 90% White, now it is 66%. Why are we allowing this to happen and how is it going to benefit us? We can all say it "Doesn't matter" but it _DOES_ matter and people speak of it in private. That's why "White Flight" is a very real event that happens.
I see an eventual shift, hopefully soon, away from this nonsense called "diversity." It's about time Whites of the world are allowed to embrace their culture, history, and race without being screamed at as "racist" by the powers that be that other groups in America are allowed to do.
No other racial group save Whites are actively working to become minorities in their indigenous lands. No other group is so suicidal, so ridiculously stupid, to enact such a policy that works, rather quickly, for their demise.
It's about time we move away from politically correct nonsense and have debate on what is happening in our countries.
Diversity breeds racism. People love to travel and explore other cultures and lands, I know I do. However, I do not want to become a minority in my own country and homeland nor is a policy beneficial when the world is less diverse than ever. Let me say this again -- racial diversity breeds racism. There is absolutely nowhere it works.
Like I have already wrote, it's about time Europe, and her off spring, wakes up.
We live in a time where it's downright "evil" for a White to dare to question the survival of his race I would rather have repliers move away from the "Racist" comment and actually respond to the points I Just made not just spit out blanket slanders because of their disagreement (or agreement) with them.
I have visited many cities. I have seen diversity to work both as a benefit, and as a negative. In the positive society's, people are united. People share common culture, while not forgetting their past. In negative societies people grasp onto their past and refuse to unite. I think that one of the first ways we can reverse this negative is to deport ALL illegal aliens.
The illegal alien flood, actually US immigration policy in general is simply encouraging mono-culturalism. Why? Because since the 1970s the overwhelming majority of people immigrating have been from Third World Hispanic nations, the majority of those from Mexico. So, it's actually bringing mono-culturalism because they are not assimilating.
Where-as, before the 1965 immigration act the status-quo was maintained and the majority of people came from European countries (who share a similar culture) and those European countries were a diverse amount (ie; equal amounts from Poland, Italy, Germany, etc) where-as now we have overwhelmingly all Hispanic countries with the majority from Mexico.
Mono-Culturalism.
Deporting all illegals is not likely. We need the labor. I support a guest worker program that does not allow a path to citizenship or allows people to pump out kids in hope of being able to stay. We keep a tabs on Guest Workers and they need to eventually go home. This means an end to ethnic ghettos, an end to bi-lingual education, any children born means they need to go home, etc.
We need the labor, not a demographic upset that has elected officials pandering to a newly coming majority at the hands of the current majority.
Race is a myth. It doesn't exist. When you speak of the "white race," you are talking about something that doesn't exist. Russians and Italians may be "white," but in terms of culture and language they are vastly different. The so-called "black" peoples of Africa are genetically quite different. Same with the peoples of Asia. Usually when people speak of "defending the white race," they mean defending Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture.
When you're talking about diversity, you ought to be talking about culture, not race.
Deporting all illegals is not likely. We need the labor.
No, we really don't. Unless of course you are talking about a business owner who would rather pay illegal dirt-cheap wages rather than a fair wage to members of his community. But that isn't the kind of business I want in my community. We don't need a nation of carpet-baggers.
No, we really don't. Unless of course you are talking about a business owner who would rather pay illegal dirt-cheap wages rather than a fair wage to members of his community. But that isn't the kind of business I want in my community. We don't need a nation of carpet-baggers.
Couldn't agree more. But, I will have to disagree with one thing--we already have a nation of carpet baggers. Multi-national organizations have no allegiance to any specific country and are only after a single objective= cheap labor.
On the diversity note, there have been several sociologic studies that found in fact the more "diversity" that exists in a nation, the more likely the ethnic conflict has or is occuring. Iraq, Bosnia, Sudan, Chad--all countries that have or are currently experiencing ethnic strife because of the "diversity" of those countries. A quote I read recently in Pat Buchanan's book, State of Emergency, I felt was very relevant to the topic of illegal immigration & diversity. "Language, culture, and history bind a nation together and distinguish nations from each other. We share a continent with Mexico, but we are not one nation with them, chiefly, if not solely because of those 3 factors."
Couldn't agree more. But, I will have to disagree with one thing--we already have a nation of carpet baggers. Multi-national organizations have no allegiance to any specific country and are only after a single objective= cheap labor.
Fo' shizzle, kdizzle. You'll get no argument from me there.
I have no problem with businesses concentrating on the bottom line and wanting to make a profit. That's what businesses should do. But it's when they care about nothing but the bottom line and maximizing profit at any cost that we have problems. There's a difference between productivity and greed.l
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdizzle
On the diversity note, there have been several sociologic studies that found in fact the more "diversity" that exists in a nation, the more likely the ethnic conflict has or is occuring. Iraq, Bosnia, Sudan, Chad--all countries that have or are currently experiencing ethnic strife because of the "diversity" of those countries.
Blaming those countries' problems solely on diversity would be a bit of a stretch, I think.
Diversity in and of itself is fine. I have no problem with it. I really enjoy it, in fact. I love my Filipinno, African American, and Hispanic neighbors. Part of this country's great strength has been the influence of so many cultures, be it the Protestant English and Dutch, the Irish or Hispanic or Italian Catholics, the Jewish immigrants, or whatever. That's great.
But I do take issue with mandated diversity. No one likes anything crammed down their throats.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdizzle
A quote I read recently in Pat Buchanan's book, State of Emergency, I felt was very relevant to the topic of illegal immigration & diversity. "Language, culture, and history bind a nation together and distinguish nations from each other. We share a continent with Mexico, but we are not one nation with them, chiefly, if not solely because of those 3 factors."
Not yet anyway.
Give it a few years. Seriously. When your average WASP family is choosing to have 1.5 children, many Generation Xers are having no children, while Hispanics have 3 or more children...well, you do the math. And when you're done doing the math, I suggest brushing up on your Spanish.
I have no problem with businesses concentrating on the bottom line and wanting to make a profit. That's what businesses should do.
I do not believe businesses should be able to work to the detriment of the state for their multi-national interest. Perhaps in a diverse state such as the United States socialism is not the best bet, but I see it as a beneficial policy in a homogeneous nation-state.
Globalization works to keep the poor poor, the rich rich, and is not beneficial for the industrialized countries or the developing ones (with some exceptions).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S.
Diversity in and of itself is fine. I have no problem with it. I really enjoy it, in fact. I love my Filipinno, African American, and Hispanic neighbors. Part of this country's great strength has been the influence of so many cultures,
However -- see my argument above. The problem with "diversity" is that it's only "Whites" practicing it. You can't have diversity when the world becomes less diverse save one racial group.
And furthermore -- the only "diverse" nations are ones that were formally White up until 30 years ago.
The whole "diversity is great" myth is balancing extremely dangerously on the edge of a slippery cliff. You can only attempt to brainwash people so much before they begin to ask obvious and extremely evident questions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S.
And when you're done doing the math, I suggest brushing up on your Spanish.
Not until Americans rise up against this nonsense. There is no benefit to having the United States turn into a Third World Mestizo nation like Latin America's poor countries such as Bolivia, Peru, El Salvador or Guatemala.
It is only the White/European countries that "embrace" diversity and multiculturalism.
Europe, Australia, are importing large amounts of Muslim-Arabs from the Middle East. The United States is importing vast hordes from the Third World.
So, what we have is the "White World" (historically White nations) actively working so that Whites become minorities in their own countries. Whites are about 10% of the world's population; where-as Asians are 2/3rds and the Black population may be slightly larger than the White one.
So why is the "White World" embracing these failed policies that work to destroy the race and culture of White nations? Why is Asia and Africa not "embracing diversity?"
How can diversity work when it turns Europe into Arabia and the United States into Mexico?
Diversity _DESTROYS_ culture and race. Whites are a minority in the world but why is it Whites that are not allowed to defend themselves? Why is it okay for other groups to come to the White countries and work to become majorities? Why are people not pushing for diversity in Asia, Asia and elsewhere?
It's a joke plain and simple. You can't have diversity when it's just White countries that embrace it. Basically, you replace the native population with another. There's no benefit to this.
Furthermore, lets look at the negative effects. The White countries of the world, and I doubt anyone could argue against this, are responsible for the overwhelming majority of technological advancement in the past couple of centuries.
What's going to happen when we are replaced with a Third World population that never exactly advanced (technologically wise)?
Also -- in Europe and America certain "minority groups" (which really are anything but in world context) bring large amounts of crime and disproportional are spent on with welfare handouts. How are these policies beneficial? You have areas in one-homogeneous countries such as Sweden that are becoming Muslim and now have problems they never had before such as gang rape and murder.
I cannot fathom how it is beneficial for Whites to work to become extinct; where-as other parts of the world are not diverse at all. Furthermore, the increased crime brought on the native inhabited is hardly a benefit?
Europe is getting fed-up with the policies, they are having riots, murder, gangs, rape, and incredibly violence they never had before in once peaceful nations. You can only enact so many speech limitations before people get upset with what is being forced on them.
In America it's similar with the illegal aliens and the crime and gangs they are bringing. In 1970 America was 90% White, now it is 66%. Why are we allowing this to happen and how is it going to benefit us? We can all say it "Doesn't matter" but it _DOES_ matter and people speak of it in private. That's why "White Flight" is a very real event that happens.
I see an eventual shift, hopefully soon, away from this nonsense called "diversity." It's about time Whites of the world are allowed to embrace their culture, history, and race without being screamed at as "racist" by the powers that be that other groups in America are allowed to do.
No other racial group save Whites are actively working to become minorities in their indigenous lands. No other group is so suicidal, so ridiculously stupid, to enact such a policy that works, rather quickly, for their demise.
It's about time we move away from politically correct nonsense and have debate on what is happening in our countries.
Diversity breeds racism. People love to travel and explore other cultures and lands, I know I do. However, I do not want to become a minority in my own country and homeland nor is a policy beneficial when the world is less diverse than ever. Let me say this again -- racial diversity breeds racism. There is absolutely nowhere it works.
Like I have already wrote, it's about time Europe, and her off spring, wakes up.
We live in a time where it's downright "evil" for a White to dare to question the survival of his race I would rather have repliers move away from the "Racist" comment and actually respond to the points I Just made not just spit out blanket slanders because of their disagreement (or agreement) with them.
TN Love and English_Teacher are two of the biggest idiots I have ever witnessed. I hope Eng. Teacher is not a real teacher. Because it would be a travesty to have an idiot like that teaching our children. I think it is funny to read these undercover racist vent about s*** they would not have the courage say otherwise.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You'll get no argument from me there.
