Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The article states the motion did not make it to a vote. However, it exposes the type of people who are running these organizations for there to even be such a ridiculous suggestion suggested.
Didn't we just have a post saying a few "nutjobs" on a Texas school board don't represent most and that bringing up what they said was obviously just drama?
All I could find was an unidentified once every 10 years working group. This particular group was dealing with 2nd graders. All I found reading several articles was that the left thought the suggestion should be ignored.
The groups make suggestions to the State Board of education.
How you say they are the left is a mystery. Nobody in Texas government would appoint any lefty to any working group.
Much less the State Board of Education.
I was not referring to that. A poster compared what the 9 teachers in Texas wanted to the teacher's union NEA.
That's not even a comparison....9 people vs a union ????
That's why I said the left are grasping for straws here thinking the Repubs are doing what the Dems are doing.
That one never even made it to a proposal. This one did and got voted on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTerri
A group of nine educators suggested this change in TX which was rightly shot down vs the NEA teacher’s Union made up of thousands of educators all over the country proposing the language in the OP.
Read the article. Neither of these posts are true, according to the Fox article in the OP.
The leftists are just trying to get ahead of the curve for the time in the future when it becomes commonplace for biological males to give birth. Frankenstein chit, but trust me, the day is coming.
Not all people who are called mother are birthing people. What are we supposed to do, call them adopting people? Oh, and what are we calling fathers? Sperm donors? And stepparents? What about trans gender parents? How do we refer to them? If we refer to them by their original function in the child’s life (birthing person/sperm donor) how is that different than the insult of calling them by their natal sex?
Oh, the questions……..
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
The teachers union members need to keep up. Birthing people lost popularity with the left once Roe vs. Wade was reversed. Now the term Woman is popular again.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
