Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2008, 05:26 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,609,273 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration backed off proposed crackdowns on no-money-down, interest-only mortgages years before the economy collapsed, buckling to pressure from some of the same banks that have now failed. It ignored remarkably prescient warnings that foretold the financial meltdown, according to an Associated Press review of regulatory documents.

AP IMPACT: US diluted loan rules before crash - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081201/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_ignored_warnings - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2008, 05:54 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,203,858 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by John1960 View Post
WASHINGTON – The Bush administration backed off proposed crackdowns on no-money-down, interest-only mortgages years before the economy collapsed, buckling to pressure from some of the same banks that have now failed. It ignored remarkably prescient warnings that foretold the financial meltdown, according to an Associated Press review of regulatory documents.

AP IMPACT: US diluted loan rules before crash - Yahoo! News (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081201/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_ignored_warnings - broken link)

If memory serves me correctly, the clinto administration is the one that laxxed the rules for lending money to those that could not afford to buy a home. So before blaming the bush reign for the mortgage debacle, take a look at the clintons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 06:13 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,861,848 times
Reputation: 9283
The media seems to ignore that Clinton and democrats STARTED this mess... Bush CONTINUED it and the democrats also prevented its correction in the past... instead of looking at the root of the problem, the media seems to like half-truths and outright deceit...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 06:24 AM
 
695 posts, read 1,377,837 times
Reputation: 142
This mortgage meltdown did NOT start in 2005. It had already started long before that.

When will people learn that our current financial situations are NOT a result of what happened yesterday, but several years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 07:01 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,164,267 times
Reputation: 6195
Default But-but-but -!!!!

Wait! It was all Bill Clinton's fault! No, it was FDR's fault! No, blame ACORN! ACORN, poor people and oh yeah the DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!

I look forward to those weak regulators explaining their inaction away, too. "By the time new rules were released late in 2006, the toughest of the proposed provisions were gone and the meltdown was under way....The government's banking agencies spent nearly a year debating the rules, which required unanimous agreement among the OCC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Federal Reserve, and the Office of Thrift Supervision — agencies that sometimes don't agree."
The administration's blind eye to the impending crisis is emblematic of its governing philosophy, which trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the economy.

Many of the banks that fought to undermine the proposals by some regulators are now either out of business or accepting billions in federal aid to recover from a mortgage crisis they insisted would never come. Many executives remain in high-paying jobs, even after their assurances were proved false.
***
B]anks said they shouldn't have to double-check the brokers. "It is not our role to be the regulator for the third-party lenders," wrote Ruthann Melbourne, chief risk officer of IndyMac Bank.
"which trusted market forces and discounted the value of government intervention in the economy" - such a gentle way to say "which held the gates open for hog-wild greed."

I look forward to the entire country recognizing and acknowledging the facts now. See, right wingers? Remember how they told you this was the fault of poor people, ACORN and the 2006 Congress? In fact, I'll bet the attacks against ACORN during the campaign about the part-time teenage workers subverting the very fabric of democracy, I'll bet calling attention to ACORN was a diversionary strategy, to get the trusty old base to connect the mortgage crisis > poor people's bad loans > ACORN lobbied for housing loans for poor people > only liberals care about poor people + Obama worked with ACORN = the housing crisis was the fault of liberals as represented by Obama, poor people and ACORN. Oh and Bill Clinton in there somewhere at the beginning. Not Phil Gramm; Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton!

They do everything they can to divert your attention, keep us divided, blaming each other. Stop falling for it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,229 posts, read 19,219,451 times
Reputation: 14916
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
If memory serves me correctly, the clinto administration is the one that laxxed the rules for lending money to those that could not afford to buy a home. So before blaming the bush reign for the mortgage debacle, take a look at the clintons.
The act that Clinton signed was a BANKING regulation.

Most of the bad paper out there came from lending institutions other than banks.

The meltdown is the Baby Bush and his Gang of Merry Thug Republicans wanting to rape the Country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 07:20 AM
 
695 posts, read 1,377,837 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
The act that Clinton signed was a BANKING regulation.

Most of the bad paper out there came from lending institutions other than banks.

The meltdown is the Baby Bush and his Gang of Merry Thug Republicans wanting to rape the Country.
Who writes mortgage loans? BANKS by chance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 07:31 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
If memory serves me correctly, the clinto administration is the one that laxxed the rules for lending money to those that could not afford to buy a home. So before blaming the bush reign for the mortgage debacle, take a look at the clintons.
This is true. It was part of the Clinton economic plan for the 21st Century. Goes right along with the CRA (Community Reinvestment Act), also a Clinton plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 09:20 AM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,482,490 times
Reputation: 4013
None of you had ever heard of CRA (which was actually passed in 1977) until September of 2007 at the earliest. That's when freerepublic.com started circulating Thomas DiLorenzo's confabulated attempts to shift blame for the credit crunch off of Republicans and onto Democrats...onto Bill Clinton if at all possible.

DiLorenzo's analysis is a fraud. It ignores the fact that CRA loans issued by CRA banks and S&L's have performed better than industry averages. It ignores the fact that CRA lending all but dried up in 2001 because the Bush administration refused to enforce the law. It ignores the fact that the paper that ultimately failed came in large waves out of the unregulated markets made by independent brokers and profit-seeking investment banks.

The situation we now find oursleves in arose in its entirety from an unwillingness on the part of laissez-faire regulators to regulate the very free-market excesses that they are charged with protecting us from, even when they were explicitly warned that a scenario very much like the one that has come to pass was looming on a not at all distant horizon.

This has been a failure of laissez-faire free-market capitalism foolishly left to its own devices, and of nothing more or less than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2008, 09:40 AM
 
1,862 posts, read 3,343,722 times
Reputation: 566
Face it - these guys in government know WAY ahead of time what's going to happen, but don't do anything about it, since their buddies are making money. Short-sighted, and deal with the consequences later, because WE, the taxpayers, will be the ones to clean up the mess. So, they don't CARE if everything is going to blow up eventually.

When I hear about these god-awful bankers who TOLD people that they'd be able to handle their mortgages - "oh, yes, you can refinance in two years, when your rate goes up on this ARM", when they KNEW that it wasn't true, that these people were going to go into foreclosure, and wouldn't be able to get a fixed loan. Bastards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:07 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top