Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-04-2009, 11:47 AM
 
21 posts, read 36,393 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lulu101 View Post
Bad analogy. Mexico would be more like Israel in this case, showing up hundreds or thousands of years after they lost the territory.
Jews have been living in Israel for thousands of years under the Ottoman. In 1880's more jews came back to Israel and drained the swamps.The Jewish effort to revitalize the land attracted an equally large immigration of Arabs from neighboring areas who were drawn by employment opportunities and healthier living conditions. There was never any attempt to "rid" the area of what few Arabs there or those Arab masses that immigrated into this area along with the Jews!

masada2000.org/historical.html
link^

Last edited by Imnothere; 01-04-2009 at 12:00 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-04-2009, 11:53 AM
 
Location: The Planet Mars
2,159 posts, read 2,583,692 times
Reputation: 523
To answer the OP - we would never give up ANY territory - I know the OP knows that...

But for the sake of posing a hypothetical ...

We would go in and kick their ever loving butts the heck out of Texas and California - re-establish US rule there - then pursue the terrorists into Mexico regardless of what the Mexican government thought -and continue hunter-killer operations until the threat of missile attacks were permanently removed...

We would occupy a sufficient 'buffer' between Mexico and the US to prevent further strikes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,766,887 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbob View Post
To answer the OP - we would never give up ANY territory - I know the OP knows that...

But for the sake of posing a hypothetical ...

We would go in and kick their ever loving butts the heck out of Texas and California - re-establish US rule there - then pursue the terrorists into Mexico regardless of what the Mexican government thought -and continue hunter-killer operations until the threat of missile attacks were permanently removed...

We would occupy a sufficient 'buffer' between Mexico and the US to prevent further strikes.
You're damn well right that is what we would do! So Israel has went further to make peace than we ever would have went! Israel did give up territory and got shells in return.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,224,166 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryB View Post
I always enjoy your posts tinman01. I was always under the impression that the military funds provided from the US to Israel was to protect them from a whole variety of Mid East enemies....not just the Palestinians. I doubt they would get that support from any European counties who claim political correctness, but don't seem to be any more fond of the Jewish nationality than they were in the past.

So, I agree that our funds may be misplaced and may even end the existing conflict....but would it be inviting an eventual blood bath from elsewhere?
Just asking.
No what I think is that necessity is the mother of invention. I think if faced with going broke supporting one war after another or finding ways to compromise Israel will but more effort into finding a middle ground. As it stands we foot the bill and they do what they wanted to do anyway. There really is no need for them to adopt an alternative approach as long as we pay the bills, and shield them from the international community.
Conversely where does Hamas get their weapons? The materials to build said weapons? The world community needs to involve themselves more in that area.
Peace can not happen as long as the outsiders continue to make war the easier option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 01:07 PM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,243,102 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
The world community needs to take control of the situation.

1) Israel needs to cease the invasion immediately
2) Peacekeepers need to be sent in on the border
3) An emergency meeting of world leaders, with Palestinian and Israeli leaders at the table, needs to take place, in which boundaries need to be drawn, and immediate implementation of Palestinian infrastructure be planned

Once the Palestinian people begin to see their lives improve, they will have no patience for Hamas.
Sen. Harry Reid (D) said this morning on a television show that Israel has every right to do what they are doing. Another democrat on another show said the same thing, I don't remember his name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 01:19 PM
 
Location: Mesa, Az
21,144 posts, read 42,138,196 times
Reputation: 3861
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
This really is a **** poor analogy.

The Mexican government lost the territory of Texas, not "Mexican" people many of whom fought to Texas' independence. Mexicans who lived in Texas during independence didn't lose their land to Texas settlers, nor for the most part where they made second class citizens.
Very true.

Many of the defenders of the Alamo apparently were the sons of those Mexicons who told Spain to take a hike a generation earlier
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 03:40 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,394,292 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imnothere View Post
Jews have been living in Israel for thousands of years under the Ottoman. In 1880's more jews came back to Israel and drained the swamps.The Jewish effort to revitalize the land attracted an equally large immigration of Arabs from neighboring areas who were drawn by employment opportunities and healthier living conditions. There was never any attempt to "rid" the area of what few Arabs there or those Arab masses that immigrated into this area along with the Jews!

masada2000.org/historical.html
link^
There most certainly was a concerted effort to rid Israel of Arabs during the 1948 war. Many cities and villages were ethinically cleansed during this period in a concerted effort to rid Israel of as much of its Arab population as possible.

http://www.oneworld-publications.com/catalogues/end_07/politics.pdf (broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 03:56 PM
 
1,434 posts, read 3,968,755 times
Reputation: 548
Quote:
OK now it really has not happened. But let's say it does. Let's say that the Mexicans decide that they want their "occupied territory" back. Let's say the demand that we give them back Texas and California. Then they send terrorist and suicide bombers into the USA and start blowing things up and killing people. We fight them for years but we finally decide that the bloodshed is not worth it and we give them back Texas and California and say "OK we have removed all US citizens from those states and we are giving them back in hopes of a lasting peace.
But then the Mexicans move into those areas and say they do not want peace and they do not think the USA has any right to exist. And then from Texas, the Mexicans begin shelling towns and cities in Oklahoma killing innocent people. But we are not really in the mood to fight them so we ask for a cease fire and they promise a cease fire. Then, the folllowing week, another 100 shells come down in Oklahoma and Nevada killing more American civilians. And they keep shelling. What do you think the USA would do at this point????
Do you see the point here with Israel and Hamas??
I agree 100% with your analogy. If a scenario like that ever happened though unfortunately most of the international media would be on Mexico's side and paint the U.S as the bad guys in all of this because most of the world hates both the U.S and Israel equally and loudly cheer for the demise of those 2 countries. You would see protests throughout the world from Tehran to London condemning the U.S for striking back against Mexico even though we were only doing it in self defense but as usual turning a blind eye whenever Mexico would fire rockets into the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 03:57 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,461,717 times
Reputation: 3563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
There most certainly was a concerted effort to rid Israel of Arabs during the 1948 war. Many cities and villages were ethinically cleansed during this period in a concerted effort to rid Israel of as much of its Arab population as possible.

http://www.oneworld-publications.com/catalogues/end_07/politics.pdf (broken link)
Apparently that effort was not a great success since above 1 million Arabs currently live INSIDE Israel and are Israel's citizens. The later 1967 effort was also a failure, since 2 millions currently live on the west bank and gaza stip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2009, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Hope, AR
1,509 posts, read 3,084,255 times
Reputation: 254
First of all, the Ottoman empire didn't last thousands of years. Jews were just one of several different groups living in the Levant. Your statement about Arabs "emigrating" there for employment opportunities is a canard--I'm assuming you got that from the book "From Time Immemorial", which was debunked as fraud shortly after it came out? You should be more careful in what you read.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Imnothere View Post
Jews have been living in Israel for thousands of years under the Ottoman. In 1880's more jews came back to Israel and drained the swamps.The Jewish effort to revitalize the land attracted an equally large immigration of Arabs from neighboring areas who were drawn by employment opportunities and healthier living conditions. There was never any attempt to "rid" the area of what few Arabs there or those Arab masses that immigrated into this area along with the Jews!

masada2000.org/historical.html
link^
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top