Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-23-2009, 10:03 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,029,434 times
Reputation: 36027

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
will the shriekers poke a pitchfork into opra's chubby posterior? how about george soros?

somehow i doubt it.
Thanks for that funny image. *chuckles*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-23-2009, 10:15 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,953 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008
If the democrats were serious, people like The Clinton's, the Kennedy's, Oprah wpuld be more socialist and less capitalist. Oprah is probably the most successful and manages to accumulate vast amounts riches. Why does her entire check not go straight to Chicago politicians to be redistributed to the more unfortunate.

Better yet let's get congress to pass a 90% tax on the entertainment business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2009, 10:31 PM
 
1,599 posts, read 2,949,435 times
Reputation: 702
At issue is not what defines "rich". I don't care how much someone has in their bank account. But when CEO's are giving themselves multi-million $ bonuses and salary increases, regardless of performance and the average workers salaries have stagnated for a decade, that is an abuse of power.

Executive Excess and the Compensation Divide: Reaching Even Greater Heights (US+distribution+wealth executive+compensation ethics business+ethics American+capitalism)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2009, 10:38 PM
 
Location: New York, New York
4,906 posts, read 6,850,341 times
Reputation: 1033
Quote:
Originally Posted by songgirl View Post
At issue is not what defines "rich". I don't care how much someone has in their bank account. But when CEO's are giving themselves multi-million $ bonuses and salary increases, regardless of performance and the average workers salaries have stagnated for a decade, that is an abuse of power.

Executive Excess and the Compensation Divide: Reaching Even Greater Heights (US+distribution+wealth executive+compensation ethics business+ethics American+capitalism)
Thats not good enough for them.Thats almost exactly what I said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 12:05 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,160,558 times
Reputation: 5941
It's hard to understand the "thinking" of those (repubs) who hate paying taxes yet worship the wealthy and think that the executives who got huge bonuses (our taxes) for their attack on the U.S. economy EARNED it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 12:23 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,276,353 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
It's hard to understand the "thinking" of those (repubs) who hate paying taxes yet worship the wealthy and think that the executives who got huge bonuses (our taxes) for their attack on the U.S. economy EARNED it!
First off - who says Republicans are the only ones who "hate paying taxes"? And, your post implies that only Republicans are the wealthy - which of course is not true.

Also, and this is purely a guess but, I would bet that there were more than a few Democrats who recieved bonus's from AIG
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 05:08 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by songgirl View Post
At issue is not what defines "rich". I don't care how much someone has in their bank account. But when CEO's are giving themselves multi-million $ bonuses and salary increases, regardless of performance and the average workers salaries have stagnated for a decade, that is an abuse of power.

Executive Excess and the Compensation Divide: Reaching Even Greater Heights (US+distribution+wealth executive+compensation ethics business+ethics American+capitalism)
Well of course they would...if the business was deemed to big to fail no reason to worry. Only in America will private enterprises be broken up for being monopolies and then the government that broke the private ones up then create their own monopoly. 100% governments fault for using tax payer dollars to run a enterprise in the free market and when it fails, as it surely would at some point, government then acts like they don't know how it happened. No kidding? Oh the sheeple... The last section of the fence is being built and they're literally handing them the materials. You know what happens when the sheep are fully surrounded by fences..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 05:11 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,480,300 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
It's hard to understand the "thinking" of those (repubs) who hate paying taxes yet worship the wealthy and think that the executives who got huge bonuses (our taxes) for their attack on the U.S. economy EARNED it!
Silly rabbit tricks are for kids. It was Obama, Dodd and Geithner went with that not republicans. Or is the democratic majority in every branch being filibustered by the republicans still? 06-08 Democrats have had power for a while now when the hell do they start being held accountable by you folks? Would a dictatorship finally wake you up?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 05:27 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,322,479 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
"""Now let's get to work. Everyone who got up early, went to school, played by the rules, make good choices - let's make sure they don;t make too much money - it is only fair because they made good decisions and thus we don't want them to get too far ahead of everyone else- it is only FAIR."""


YUP, last 8 years we did EXACTLY that! In case you hadn't noticed THOSE people are also OUT OF A JOB!



And ONLY morons think all the wealthy worked their way out of a ghetto and struggled to the top.
" [the] last eight years...", blah, blah blah. Blame the rest of your entire sorry life on "the last eight years then". See if anyone cares. You ought to be more concerned with the next four years (and hope it won't be eight).

Only morons think that a poor person can't work their way out of a ghetto. But when you keep telling a person that they can't, and that they have no chance, they are less likely to try.

No one here ever said all the wealthy started out poor (or middle class). But it is certainly safe to say that most did (may depend on your definition of "wealthy").

A child growing up in a wealthy home still has to make his or her own way. Even if a parent can afford the best schools for a child, it is no guarantee that child will be "successful" (whatever your definition of "success" is). It is certainly no guarantee that they will be rich. There is an old saying that "you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink".

By the same token, many poorer children have grown to be quite successful, and even wealthy.

Why do leftists always assume that the poor are destined to remain poor, and that it is the rich that are putting them in that position? That is utter nonsense, and just plain garbage!

The leftists continue to foment this class envy. Yet children who are raised in homes of lower income people have the same wherewithal as anybody else to get ahead in life. No one is holding them back.

There is no country in the world that offers more opportunity to improve ones standard of living than the U.S. There is no other country in the world where it is easier to become wealthy (if that is a desired goal), if one strives for it, and has the ambition, skill, and is of at least average intelligence. If there is such a country, name it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2009, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Hometown of Jason Witten
5,985 posts, read 4,381,030 times
Reputation: 1922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
If the democrats were serious, people like The Clinton's, the Kennedy's, Oprah wpuld be more socialist and less capitalist. Oprah is probably the most successful and manages to accumulate vast amounts riches. Why does her entire check not go straight to Chicago politicians to be redistributed to the more unfortunate.

Better yet let's get congress to pass a 90% tax on the entertainment business.
Never happen. The Hollywood crowd gives a lot of campaign money to the Left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top