Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That was my point, swagger...Coulter has no journalistic credibility; she seems to find simply being humane a challenge. She is not to be confused with credible conservative writers like Krauthammer,
Brooks, Hitchens or Will. Coulter writes opinion pieces, and poor ones at that. Like Limbaugh, Coulter
uses her "bully pulpit" to appeal to the lowest common denominator. As Mr. Opinion stated, that "brand" of distasteful hate-mongering has begun to repel more Americans than it attracts. Yes, they have their loyal followers, but they aren't attracting hordes of new ones.
It's perfect. It's just the type of poll I would expect Ann Coulter to post herself.
It indeed is perfect. I see people treating Ann Coulter the way they do any woman, Republican or Democrat, when a political debate gets heated. Instead of attacking the line of reasoning or debate points, they attack the person or the persona. It happens to Hillary a lot, also.
Ann Coulter is very smart and to have Joy sitting there as stupid as she is with her mouth full...haha
abort Joy!
Btw isn't waterboarding happening in pools all over the USA when kids are pushing each other under water and when parents are playing with their kids they sometimes push each other under water...over and over and having fun at the same time...isn't it so that these terrorist never learned how to swim but rather learned how to hate other people and how to make a bomb....
I'm not sure I get this. Are you saying that parents from the USA are teaching their children to construct underwater bombs to blow up hated people that never learned to swim? Because if you are, I'm all for it! Props to you!
By the way, Coulter really needs to mix in a sandwich or a pizza every now and then...
Well, you do have to give Joy points for being more of the Larry King-type interviewer, instead of a "The View"-type interviewer. She is not attempting to truly debate, but to be more of a questioner, and open the door for her guest to express her own viewpoint.
Behar is much more enjoyable in this format, and did not actually "lose" the debate, but won a little favor from my direction.
While Condoleezza may not be as extreme, Ann Coulter is just as intelligent, if not moreso than her. Ann went to Cornell and University of Michigan for law school. Condoleezza went to Uni Denver (where her father worked as assistant dean) and then Notre Dame for her Masters in Political Science.
I consider Ann's education to be more impressive.
While Condoleezza may not be as extreme, Ann Coulter is just as intelligent, if not moreso than her. Ann went to Cornell and University of Michigan for law school. Condoleezza went to Uni Denver (where her father worked as assistant dean) and then Notre Dame for her Masters in Political Science.
I consider Ann's education to be more impressive.
That's great, really. However, she is a nonessential in that she is absolutely completely insane. Go on this Margaret and Helen Time. :). And then click on a couple of their blog postings of Coulter, you may understand.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes!
