Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To be fair - I never suggested anything other then the US is not a "Democracy" as KevK first suggested.
True. A democratic republic is not a republican form, either.
To put it in perspective:
A democratic form is 3 wolves, and 2 lambs voting on the dinner menu.
A republican form is 3 muzzled wolves, and 2 lambs, with UZIs, ordering pizza.
In plainer terms, a democracy's majority can impose its will upon a minority, depriving them of their inalienable rights.
In a republican form, an individual is a majority of one, that no democracy can take his rights.
Of course, one may surrender those inalienable rights, to exercise civil or political liberties.
Part of the problem is that millions of Americans have been indoctrinated by the world's greatest propaganda ministry to voluntarily surrender their inalienable rights and sign up for national socialism (FICA).
There is no law compelling all Americans to apply for an account and number, and there is no law punishing Americans who do not participate.
It is 100% voluntary - voluntary servitude.
Yet millions believe they have to get "the number" before they can work in their own country.
Well, now. THAT'S INSIGHTFUL. "Fall guy" for whom? You know, I think I've read somewhere that law enforcement thought the same thing. Maybe he was a fall guy for some militia out there.
Just like 9/11 , OKC was a inside job. It just happened to coincide with Clinton's war on the militias and they made a very convenient scapegoat for OKC.
Ahhhh, another Southern Povery Law Center hater. Have you had "experience" with the SPLC too?
You know, those folks who are members of the white supremacist web site, stormfront, hate SPLC..........and some of them have been investigated by that organization.
Nope never been investigated by that hateful group as far as i know. But anyone who does not toe the pc line is automatically a racist in their eyes. I actually subscribe to their magazine and get the online emails. Never hurts to watch your enemy as well as they watch you.
[quote=stillkit;10242501]It's alarming, though hardly surprising, how many in this thread would support, or at least acquiesce to, some kind of armed revolt. I don't think we've had such an example of people referring to their fellow citizens as the "enemy" or "traitors" since the days just before the Civil War.
Sadly, some imagine such a thing as being so very exciting. So did the hotheads in the South, but by 1865, their opinions had changed. After seeing their land laid waste and thousands of their sons and daughters dead, many of them had developed a different opinion about trying to overthrow the duly elected government. Some of us have seen the results of civil war and genocide, and let me tell you...it is NOT something you should wish on your worst enemy.
And, overthrowing the legitimately elected government is exactly what we're talking about here, no matter how many excuses you can come up with. Ironically, such talk often comes from those who claim they love America and the Constitution. Advocating an armed effort to subvert the demonstrated Will of The People is about the most anti-Constitutional thing you can do. Why? Because for the Constitution and our democracy to work, the losing side in any election must graciously and peacefully give way to the new majority. They may organize and protest, march and garner support, but the minute they take up arms, they reveal themselves as true enemies of liberty and freedom and should be dealt with accordingly. There is a clear, distinct line between political protest and treason and that line runs right down the barrel of a gun.
Plus, of course, nobody ever talks about what they would replace the current government with. Simply beautiful, I agree completely with this post. When we advocate armed resistance, we advocate anarchy and the destruction of the constitution. What is happening right now that is so terrible that people feel the need for armed revolt?
Bad Economy, Obama Fuel Rise in Militias: Report
Fears of a return to anti-government violence of the 1990s
The election of America's first black president, fears of a secret Mexican plot to take over the Southwest and a painful recession have combined to fuel a rise in violent right-wing militias, according to a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
One of two comments gives us more insight into the sicko repug racist mind.
Quote:
anonymous_user:
Americans will not except{sic} a black president and his unamerican attempts to make us a communust{sic} country and appoint such brown rascist{sic} trash as sotomeyor on the surpreme{sic} court listen to rush limbaugh and shawn hannity on wbap 820 and wake up
Last edited by meson; 08-12-2009 at 06:50 PM..
Reason: missed one {sic}
It's alarming, though hardly surprising, how many in this thread would support, or at least acquiesce to, some kind of armed revolt. I don't think we've had such an example of people referring to their fellow citizens as the "enemy" or "traitors" since the days just before the Civil War.
Sadly, some imagine such a thing as being so very exciting. So did the hotheads in the South, but by 1865, their opinions had changed. After seeing their land laid waste and thousands of their sons and daughters dead, many of them had developed a different opinion about trying to overthrow the duly elected government. Some of us have seen the results of civil war and genocide, and let me tell you...it is NOT something you should wish on your worst enemy.
And, overthrowing the legitimately elected government is exactly what we're talking about here, no matter how many excuses you can come up with. Ironically, such talk often comes from those who claim they love America and the Constitution. Advocating an armed effort to subvert the demonstrated Will of The People is about the most anti-Constitutional thing you can do. Why? Because for the Constitution and our democracy to work, the losing side in any election must graciously and peacefully give way to the new majority. They may organize and protest, march and garner support, but the minute they take up arms, they reveal themselves as true enemies of liberty and freedom and should be dealt with accordingly. There is a clear, distinct line between political protest and treason and that line runs right down the barrel of a gun.
Plus, of course, nobody ever talks about what they would replace the current government with. Simply beautiful, I agree completely with this post. When we advocate armed resistance, we advocate anarchy and the destruction of the constitution. What is happening right now that is so terrible that people feel the need for armed revolt?
I totally agree. Also,I am sick of all the whining from the far right nuts,looking for any excuse to "take up arms" against our new president. Bunch of sore losers,IMHO.
LOL...crackpot. SF is a White Nationalist forum try again please.
Exact same thing. I realize that "stormfront" likes to call itself and its members "White Nationalists" these days. Trying to improve your "image" from the days of KKK so you can attract all those "closet racists" out there. I've read stormfront and David Duke. I'm aware of the direction which has been taken. I also donate to Southern Poverty Law Center.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Have you had "experience" with the SPLC too? 
