Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Obama himself shocked by the decision?
Yes, Obama himself was bewildered and wondered what drugs the committee is on 165 70.21%
No, Obama felt fully deserving of the award. Whether the award would come was never in question. 70 29.79%
Voters: 235. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:06 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 10,279,481 times
Reputation: 1893

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reelist in Atlanta View Post
Yeah I just heard that. What did he do to win it? I didn't hear that.

- Reel
Oh, I don't know--completely reverse the world's opinion of the U.S. in less than 6 months?

The conservatives are exploding with hate over this. Let's all just sit back and watch their predictable meltdown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,285,820 times
Reputation: 3826
Obamapologetics n. a systemic excusing of Obama for actions blatantly contradicting his change rhetoric simply on the grounds that Obama committed said actions. The term can be applied more broadly to any justificatory rhetorics used by or on behalf of supposed "liberals" or those claiming to work for progress on behalf of the people, while acting in fact against their interests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:08 PM
 
99 posts, read 163,402 times
Reputation: 74
Memo to the conservative posters here: please understand the context of this conversation properly. These left-wing loons just spent the entire 2008 calendar year pouring their hearts and souls into this chicago clown that occupies the white house. They now see that just within 9 months their messiah is falling apart and they are lashing out to justify their emotional investment in this community organizer. They cannot come to terms with the fact that he is a disaster and are not able to lash out at him or themselves, so they do it to us to feel self-righteous. The more they lash out, the wider the grins on your faces should get conservatives. Take a step back for a minute and just appreciate the moment. Appreciate the left's fury at the fact that their messiah is failing.

I'm loving it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:09 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,127,661 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Oh, I don't know--completely reverse the world's opinion of the U.S. in less than 6 months?

The conservatives are exploding with hate over this. Let's all just sit back and watch their predictable meltdown.
6 months? Who said anything about 6 months? Nominations were to be postmarked by February 1, 2009. By most calculations, that about 12 days after he was inaugurated. If you can convince us that world opinion changed in 12 days, i'll buy it. But we all know that's not the case. This is a farce, and is hurtful, not helpful to Obama. I believe Obama realizes this, but his drooling worshipers just aren't that intellectually gifted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Saturn
1,519 posts, read 1,632,796 times
Reputation: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
So, have you figured out what Barack Obama has done to deserve the Nobel Peace Prize yet?
In terms of foreign affairs :

Obtained an agreement with Russian PM Medvedev to reduce nuclear arms
(in Europe).

Instigated talks between the zionists and Palestinians at G20 and has appointed George Mitchell as envoy to the Middle East and has stated that it is his policy to try to bring about a solution to the problem.

Has addressed directly the Islamic Republic of Iran and has pledged to try to resolve the US/Iranian conflict.

Has altered US foreign policy in terms of stating that his Presidency will ensure that America will work with other countries to try to bring about a peaceful solution.

Has undertaken to withdraw troops from Iraq.

Has partially lifted the embargo on Cuba and has said that he is prepared to talk with Cuba.

Chaired UN security council meeting recently.



Incidentally, Washington-based Foreign Policy magazine asked 35 US foreign affairs specialists around DC to rate him so far. The result? Eleven As, 16 Bs, 7 Cs, and a D.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Reading, PA
4,011 posts, read 4,426,570 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnStockton View Post
Memo to the conservative posters here: please understand the context of this conversation properly. These left-wing loons just spent the entire 2008 calendar year pouring their hearts and souls into this chicago clown that occupies the white house. They now see that just within 9 months their messiah is falling apart and they are lashing out to justify their emotional investment in this community organizer. They cannot come to terms with the fact that he is a disaster and are not able to lash out at him or themselves, so they do it to us to feel self-righteous. The more they lash out, the wider the grins on your faces should get conservatives. Take a step back for a minute and just appreciate the moment. Appreciate the left's fury at the fact that their messiah is failing.

I'm loving it.
Apparently you have somehow managed to be unaware of exactly how many of us on the left wing were not Obama supporters during the primary. Or, more likely, you ignore that fact because it doesn't suit your current rant. You righties are really good at ignoring facts. It's sorta your thing, isn't it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:13 PM
 
99 posts, read 163,402 times
Reputation: 74
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovingForward View Post
Oh, I don't know--completely reverse the world's opinion of the U.S. in less than 6 months?

The conservatives are exploding with hate over this. Let's all just sit back and watch their predictable meltdown.

The only meltdown that's taking place is by Jeremiah Wright's deciple that currently occupies the white house with a filibuster proof gov't and ability to pass anything despite the GOP. Yet he is unable to get anything done and this eats away at your soul

Also, he and you see the clock running down to 2010 and are getting desperate. You know what happens in 2010. That's the year many Dems get a boot in their a** and get removed from office and your messiah becomes even more politically impotent. As impotent as he is now with total control of gov't, just watch what happens when his party no longer has total control.

Who's the one melting down? Hint (ok answer): YOU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:15 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,127,661 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indurain View Post
In terms of foreign affairs :

Obtained an agreement with Russian PM Medvedev to reduce nuclear arms
(in Europe).

Instigated talks between the zionists and Palestinians at G20 and has appointed George Mitchell as envoy to the Middle East and has stated that it is his policy to try to bring about a solution to the problem.

Has addressed directly the Islamic Republic of Iran and has pledged to try to resolve the US/Iranian conflict.

Has altered US foreign policy in terms of stating that his Presidency will ensure that America will work with other countries to try to bring about a peaceful solution.

Has undertaken to withdraw troops from Iraq.

Has partially lifted the embargo on Cuba and has said that he is prepared to talk with Cuba.

Chaired UN security council meeting recently.



Incidentally, Washington-based Foreign Policy magazine asked 35 US foreign affairs specialists around DC to rate him so far. The result? Eleven As, 16 Bs, 7 Cs, and a D.
As expected, completely out of context. The Nobel Peace Prize could not have been awarded to Obama based off of these stated issues because nary any of it was accomplished by February 1, 2009. If the Committee is reversing its stance to be a forecaster of good deeds instead of rewarding tried and true accomplishments, then your post would hold water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:18 PM
 
Location: Saturn
1,519 posts, read 1,632,796 times
Reputation: 246
Quote:
Originally Posted by lisake View Post
The threads were combined. The poll was on a thread posted after the original one, but once the threads were combined, the poll remained. It gives the impression that the OP of the first thread on the subject, AnUnidentifiedMale, authored the poll, but he/she did not.

I wish the poll would be removed, or at the very least, the name of the author of the poll would be listed.
yep - not the first time that this place has had stuff "edited" to suit a particular viewpoint.

A whole series of posts made today, have suddenly been "re-numbered"
by the powers that be here.

Kinda convenient of them - especially when their ilk are coping the level of flack for their partisan venom and lies.
I reported one of poster for a racist comment - needless to say they did nothing about the offending post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2009, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,755,547 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhett_Butler View Post
Sinister motives??? OH!!! You mean partisanship.... Yeah, your objections are purely partisan.

Believe it or not, extending an olive branch to long-standing enemies IS considered a VERY peaceful act by those who are not blinded by the fact that they didn't vote for him.

Now I can understand how some might believe that the fact that, in many respects, his overtures have been rejected by these enemies means that he's a failure at peace, but perhaps the committee is looking at this in terms of a COMPLETE 180 degree shift from typical U.S. Foreign Policy and are looking to reward it???

I can agree that it seems premature, but I do NOT agree with you in thinking that it's completely undeserved.

I agree this award was clearly partisan. Again you are unable to point out any tangible acheivement to justify the prize.

Well it is completely undeserved, you seem to say he got it because he is not GWB and you would be right. This is not the basis for an award. This thing is further degraded, it is a real shame.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top