Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-29-2009, 09:23 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Ok, I misread "gentlemans club"...

So tell me when this man sponsored birth control bills, that wouldnt be a hypocrite, especially considering he might have had the girl "pregnant"

Did the girl have an abortion? Did he fund an abortion? Did he write legislation to limit people from having sex with those that were much younger than they are? Seriously, the hatred from the left never ceases to amaze me..
You demanded to know if he had "proposed legislation to regulate morality in other people," the answer was he certainly did, now you ignore that. Do you think he checked with that girl to be sure she was on Norplant? Do you think if that girl *had* gotten pregnant he'd suddenly be rethinking his anti-abortion position? They didnt find condoms in his car, they found toys and Viagra.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-29-2009, 09:27 AM
 
Location: SE Florida
9,367 posts, read 25,215,139 times
Reputation: 9454
I guess he replaced his bible belt with sex toys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 09:38 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
You demanded to know if he had "proposed legislation to regulate morality in other people," the answer was he certainly did, now you ignore that. Do you think he checked with that girl to be sure she was on Norplant? Do you think if that girl *had* gotten pregnant he'd suddenly be rethinking his anti-abortion position? They didnt find condoms in his car, they found toys and Viagra.
The thread is about his "hypocracy", I asked for individuals to backup the hypocracy.

The legislation for/against abortion has NOTHING to do with sleeping around, unless the offspring was a child or an abortion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 09:55 AM
 
35,016 posts, read 39,159,646 times
Reputation: 6195
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
The thread is about his "hypocracy", I asked for individuals to backup the hypocracy.

The legislation for/against abortion has NOTHING to do with sleeping around, unless the offspring was a child or an abortion.
"You demanded to know if he had 'proposed legislation to regulate morality in other people,' the answer was he certainly did, now you ignore that." My posts you quoted describe his hypocrisy. Your own comment, "So tell me when this man sponsored birth control bills, that wouldnt be a hypocrite, especially considering he might have had the girl 'pregnant'" -- that would have been the height of hypocrisy, wouldnt it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 10:14 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,847,480 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by HIF View Post
I guess he replaced his bible belt with sex toys.
Yeah see people that read the bible dont have sex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 10:17 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,847,480 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
That would be another thread, Jadex.
Pffft Yeah I'm not allowed to comment on Gregs post lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 11:10 AM
 
2,016 posts, read 5,206,195 times
Reputation: 1879
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
So now your claiming that having gay sex is immoral? When did that change because it wasnt too long ago liberals were shouting all over the place asking for their "rights" to have gay sex and get married, and denying them right was what was immoral. Now liberals are claiming that partaking in that "right" is also immoral?
There are some very deluded, BLATANT liars in this world. Thus, this is why the Ignore feature was invented and why I am going to use it this very minute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by delusianne View Post
That would be another thread, Jadex.
Darn, I was going to throw in a bit about Lindsey Graham since he does serve in the Senate from South Carolina but I sure don't want to get off topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,466,581 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jadex View Post
So what is wrong with family values?


As I said the term family values has been completely hijacked by the right. To me family values means treating everyone with respect, that everyone should have a chance to succeed, that everyone should have equal rights, that we should not discriminate against anyone for any reason be it race, ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation. However, to those who waive the family values flag they have a very different definition of what family values is, and will question the morality of those who don't share their view of what family values actually is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2009, 12:18 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,847,480 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
As I said the term family values has been completely hijacked by the right. To me family values means treating everyone with respect, that everyone should have a chance to succeed, that everyone should have equal rights, that we should not discriminate against anyone for any reason be it race, ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation. However, to those who waive the family values flag they have a very different definition of what family values is, and will question the morality of those who don't share their view of what family values actually is.
Hijacked by the right? Is there something stopped democrats from talking about family values. Shouldnt democrats be telling those in their party to have and share and represent family values? Sometimes democrats act like talking about this is worst thing ever to talk about.

hate to tell you that is the same family values that those on the right " preach" about people having. So you have the same definition as those on the right. So whats the problem

What difference do you think the right has when it comes to family values that you didnt just post?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top