Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,934,385 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

DOE sends a “litigation hold notice” regarding CRU to employees – asking to “preserve documents” « Watts Up With That?

Quote:
DOE-SR has received a “Litigation Hold Notice” from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) General Council and the DOE Office of Inspector General regarding the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England.

Accordingly, they are requesting that SRNS, SRR and other Site contractors locate and preserve all documents, records, data, correspondence, notes, and other materials, whether official or unofficial, original or duplicative, drafts or final versions, partial or complete that may relate to the global warming, including, but not limited to, the contract files, any related correspondence files, and any records, including emails or other correspondence, notes, documents, or other material related to this contract, regardless of its location or medium on which it is stored.

In other words, please preserve any and all documents relevant to “global warming, the Climate Research Unit at he University of East Anglia In England, and/or climate change science.”
Very interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:15 PM
 
19,226 posts, read 15,316,811 times
Reputation: 2337
Paper trail, or paper mountain?

Should be fun reading.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2009, 10:35 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,090,553 times
Reputation: 9383
DOE-SR has received a “Litigation Hold Notice” from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) General Council and the DOE Office of Inspector General regarding the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England.

Is the University of East Anglia in England obligated to listen to a legal notice from the DOE? I'm curious about the jurisdictional issues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,934,385 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
DOE-SR has received a “Litigation Hold Notice” from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) General Council and the DOE Office of Inspector General regarding the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in England.

Is the University of East Anglia in England obligated to listen to a legal notice from the DOE? I'm curious about the jurisdictional issues
Any "correspondence" those entities sent the email had with the CRU are to be held - and you can bet, there would be thousands.

correspondence=all this;

Quote:
documents, records, data, correspondence, notes, and other materials, whether official or unofficial, original or duplicative, drafts or final versions, partial or complete that may relate to the global warming, including, but not limited to, the contract files, any related correspondence files, and any records, including emails or other correspondence, notes, documents, or other material related to this contract, regardless of its location or medium on which it is stored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,765,227 times
Reputation: 24863
Witch Hunt by any other name is still a Witch Hunt. I think it is a waste of time and energy designed to disrupt the studies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 09:44 AM
 
160 posts, read 161,615 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Witch Hunt by any other name is still a Witch Hunt. I think it is a waste of time and energy designed to disrupt the studies.
you just don't want to know the truth do you? You like being in the dark so you have someone to point a finger at when it finally sinks in that you were duped. Why wouldn't you want to see the information if it proves things one way or another?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 09:48 AM
 
1,963 posts, read 1,822,287 times
Reputation: 844
This is just a cop-out, nothing will ever come of this.

"We did an investigation and found nothing pertaining to fraud," says White House cronie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 09:49 AM
 
160 posts, read 161,615 times
Reputation: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by k.smith904 View Post
This is just a cop-out, nothing will ever come of this.

"We did an investigation and found nothing pertaining to fraud," says White House cronie.
Just like ACORN.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,934,385 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Witch Hunt by any other name is still a Witch Hunt. I think it is a waste of time and energy designed to disrupt the studies.
A noble cause, way over due.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2009, 10:08 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,960 posts, read 22,139,830 times
Reputation: 13795
If this data gets into the hands of agenda driven, like-minded fraudsters then it will not matter if they find solid proof of fraud and deceit, because they will cover it up. But we can hope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top