Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Senator Harry Reid step down for his racist comments about Obama?
Yes - If a Republican had said it the Democrats would call for his head. 75 78.13%
No - Because a Democrat said it, it's okay to let it go. 21 21.88%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:45 PM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,329,966 times
Reputation: 8066

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
I am about to post a new thread where people of both leanings can probably learn a lot, but probably most will ignore it and all the good information is provides. I learned that most people want to know but don't know a great lot about the early founding days of this nation. You will get a kick out of that site whether everybody does or not.
By all means post it. Be sure to include 1964 and the machinations that took place to pass the Civil Rights Act...a lot of people in this thread need help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:45 PM
 
Location: VA
796 posts, read 505,354 times
Reputation: 327
While I think what he said has some truth to it....it was very much in poor taste what Sen. Reid said. If Sen. McConnell said it...Dems and blacks would label him as a racist but its ok that Sen. Reid said it. There is definitely a double standard and a republican would've been asked to step down. I just can't believe how dumb and out of touch Reid is. He should've had more sense than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 08:58 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by VABlkCONSERV View Post
If Sen. McConnell said it...Dems and blacks would label him as a racist
If McConnell had said such a thing while in the process of deciding to endorse and campaign for Obama, Dems and blacks wouldn't have said a thing.

No double standard, just a huge qualitative difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 09:37 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Southern Democrats have dirty hands. Democrats. Nothing partisan about the facts.
From the Wiki link:

By party
The original House version:[9]

Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[10]

Democratic Party: 44-23 (66%-34%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version:[9]

Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:[9]

Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)

I posted the regional votes earlier. Do keep in mind there weren't many southern Republicans at the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 09:47 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
And here we have the typical liberal...

More upset over a one sided poll, then the racist comments being made by Reid, because it was a member of their party. I dont once for a second think you would think "so what" had similar comments been made by a Republican...
You mean like these?

Quote:
"We are being told that we have to hope [Obama] succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles ... because his father was black."
Quote:
"I do believe" Obama is an "angry black guy."
Quote:
[i]n Obama's America, the white kids now get beat up with the black kids cheering."
Quote:
Obama is "more African in his roots than he is American" and is "behaving like an African colonial despot.
Quote:
Obama is "Halfrican-American."
Quote:
"Obama has disowned his white half ... he's decided he's got to go all in on the black side."
Quote:
Obama "wants us to have the same health care and plan that he had in Kenya" and "wants to be the black FDR."
Quote:
sings "Barack, The Magic Negro."
Limbaugh's "colorblind" history of racially charged comments | Media Matters for America

To think that Steele didn't ask Limbaugh to stop or resign. Instead, Steele booked Limbaugh to speak at the CPAC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:20 PM
 
10,719 posts, read 20,298,303 times
Reputation: 10021
Yes he should. It would be hypocritical on behalf of liberals if they said he shouldn't. His comments were racist and shameful. Liberals pride themselves on being different from conservatives in that they are fair and objective so if you are, you have to call a spade a spade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2010, 10:29 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,815,033 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan. View Post
Yes he should. It would be hypocritical on behalf of liberals if they said he shouldn't. His comments were racist and shameful. Liberals pride themselves on being different from conservatives in that they are fair and objective so if you are, you have to call a spade a spade.
I would think this comment would qualify Reid to speak at the next CPAC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 02:05 AM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,464,356 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by azriverfan. View Post
Yes he should. It would be hypocritical on behalf of liberals if they said he shouldn't. His comments were racist and shameful. Liberals pride themselves on being different from conservatives in that they are fair and objective so if you are, you have to call a spade a spade.
But then they might jeopardize the health care steal..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 06:15 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,760 posts, read 14,654,294 times
Reputation: 18529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
It's not quite that cut and dried.

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)

The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

Plus more that I didn't copy out of copyright concerns, but you can look at the link yourself. It was very much a northern/southern thing, especially with the Dems.

Then there's this:

Southern strategy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans.

Your friends,

The Nixon Adminstration
Oh yes, and you know what those southern Democratic racists are now?

That's right--Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 06:19 AM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,846,025 times
Reputation: 1942
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
You mean like these?

















Limbaugh's "colorblind" history of racially charged comments | Media Matters for America

To think that Steele didn't ask Limbaugh to stop or resign. Instead, Steele booked Limbaugh to speak at the CPAC.
Rush doesnt work for Steele
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top