Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Debuting on Tuesday's "O'Reilly Factor," the former vice presidential candidate drew almost 4 million viewers more than doubling the combined total of MSNBC's Keith Olbermann and CNN's Campbell Brown.
The following evening on "Glenn Beck," Palin attracted over 3 million -- at 5PM!
I totally agree with you. We liberals actually work. You know, that's when you have a job, earning money, and can't be home all day long watching TV Liberals just didn't get hit hard by the recession.
I totally agree with you. We liberals actually work. You know, that's when you have a job, earning money, and can't be home all day long watching TV Liberals just didn't get hit hard by the recession.
Can stupidity be considered stupid in itself? I saw O'Reilly ask if CNN and MSNBC were so smart, why were their ratings going down? Again, stupid, just like the premise of this thread.
Ratings and "rightness" are not related concepts. People watching doesn't equate to people agreeing. Will sanrene ever get that through her head?
You've got the poor buggers going now. They are digging so much that they are comparing modern singers with musicians from over 200 years ago. I nearly died laughing at that part.
Can stupidity be considered stupid in itself? I saw O'Reilly ask if CNN and MSNBC were so smart, why were their ratings going down? Again, stupid, just like the premise of this thread.
Ratings and "rightness" are not related concepts. People watching doesn't equate to people agreeing. Will sanrene ever get that through her head?
Are you one of the liberals who claim they watch those shows because they are so funny? If so, I don't think you are doing it for entertainment as in laughing kind.
I actually steeled myself to watch that Glenn Beck/Palin show (despite my loathing of Fox) - it was completely devoid of any news/discussion worthy content and consisted mostly of Beck creepily fawning over Palin, somehow managing to refer to her in the same breath as George Washington, having a mutual pity-party about how mean everyone is to both of them, whining about how you can't trust anyone in politics (Really? That's something new )- all padded out with some fluff about God and a chart which showed Glenn Beck having 3 percentage points of some random Most Admired People poll (compared to Obama's 25%) and Mrs Palin showing joint 14% with Hillary Clinton on the ladies chart.
The whole show was about as informative and interesting as a soap powder commercial and I found the lack of passion and ability to enliven any "discussion" point on Palin's part quite astonishing, given that she seems to be the person on whom the Republicans are pinning all their hopes for rejuvenating themselves after their defeat All in all, very poor show in every sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Liberals just didn't get hit hard by the recession.
)- all padded out with some fluff about God and a chart which showed Glenn Beck having 3 percentage points of some random Most Admired People poll (compared to Obama's 25%) and Mrs Palin showing joint 14% with Hillary Clinton on the ladies chart. 
All in all, very poor show in every sense.
