Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtinChicago View Post
Fiscal collapse as will/is happen/ing in California or an awakened and irate electorate and state leaders like Christie of New Jersey.
Add Illinois to that...
Illinois enters a state of insolvency | Crain's Chicago Business

The unions' plush pensions and retiree benefits will fall. There simply isn't the money, or the ability to take on more debt, to pay them. End of story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2010, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Did you read any of the comments in this rag?

Yeah lets do away with unions we can all work for $3 an hour with no benefits
The comments are taken directly from Gov. Christie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 04:55 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Truly incredible. Now we know why manufacturing is in the toilet in the US and states are buckling under the weight of these union goodies to retirees.
What's truly incredible is this is about public sector employees in NJ and you somehow try to mystically tie it in with manufacturing problems. Just WHAT is it these people were manufacturing?

And, if you want to talk about union costs in manufacturing, IF you're possibly interested in actually presenting an overall picture, it's necessary to also present a rundown of just how much non-union management contributes vs. what they receive in benefits, golden parachutes included, when they leave the company.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Just for once, just one time, try to address the topic of the thread.

Unionized government employees and their Golden Parachutes for retirement.

Can you honestly claim that an investment of $125,000 should yield a payout of over $3 million, all paid for by the taxpayers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,938,291 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
This is what NJ is facing and no doubt every other state when it comes to state employee benefits.
For states it is actually much worse.

Pension tsunami


Caution, really scary reading, may keep you up at night.

Reality is about to set in. (http://scw.tearn.com/2010/02/milestones_10.html - broken link)

Quote:
These grandiose grants looked good on paper, were politically popular and were received by the beneficiaries with enthusiasm. CalPers, the nation’s largest public pension plan was rolling in wealth topping $200 billion in assets.

That is until 2008, when the financial grim reaper came knocking
.
As of the end of January 2010, CalPers is $63 billion underfunded. That is the money they are currently short to meet all of their retirement requirements. That is over 30% of their total assets.

They are now paying out nearly $2 billion a month more in retirement benefits than they are taking in or earning on their investments.
$2 billion a month ain't nothing, California taxpayers can easily pick that up. To put it in perspective with a population of 33 million that comes to a shortfall of $60.60 per month per every man, woman and child living in the state or just $240 a month for a family of four to make up the shortfall!

What a wonderfully, solid system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:03 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Just for once, just one time, try to address the topic of the thread.
BULL!

You
started the thread

You attempted to tie this in with manufacturing.

I'll ask again: Just WHAT were these people manufacturing?

Or do you find it so difficult to stay on your own topic you lose it in the first post?

Perhaps just once, just one time, perhaps you might actually take the time to review what you are posting and be familiar with the material.

Last edited by burdell; 02-13-2010 at 05:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:07 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Can you honestly claim that an investment of $125,000 should yield a payout of over $3 million, all paid for by the taxpayers?


I can honestly claim that until you also post what non-union workers invest vs. what they reap in payouts that this is just another biased, anti-union, baseless piece of blather.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:11 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,314,559 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Just for once, just one time, try to address the topic of the thread.

Unionized government employees and their Golden Parachutes for retirement.

Can you honestly claim that an investment of $125,000 should yield a payout of over $3 million, all paid for by the taxpayers?
Sarene, you seem so well versed in government worker union history will you please answer my questions in #5...just for once? (Copied below for your convenience.)

Quote:
I'd like to know how many years the guy paid into the pension plan to total that $124,000 and who was managing/investing that pension program for the workers all those years. Were they/the state skimming off the top of the pension program to pay for general fund projects in the state the way the federal government did with Social Security so there was less money invested than should have been thus cutting its growth potential? I'd also like to know how on earth anyone can say the man will draw back out $3.3 million in pension payments. Do they have a crystal ball to know how long he'll live? Do you know how many people die within a few years of retiring and don't draw any where near as much as they paid into the system?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:29 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,153,076 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boompa View Post
Did you read any of the comments in this rag?

Yeah lets do away with unions we can all work for $3 an hour with no benefits
Yup, the Repugs think the American economy will be saved when everyone makes minimum wage except for their god , the Wealthy.

The Wealthy have these poor stupid slobs so brainwashed that they will always have their support destroying THEMSELVES....


That's why the right is so religious, they worship their god, The Wealthy....out of fear.....and hate their fellow middle class Americans...weird-asps....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 05:59 PM
 
3,332 posts, read 1,963,864 times
Reputation: 3359
Default abso-friggin-lutely

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtinChicago View Post
Fiscal collapse as will/is happen/ing in California or an awakened and irate electorate and state leaders like Christie of New Jersey.

Rollback pay and benefits for the "new priviledged" classes and get them more in line with what average working men and women in corporate America receive.

Say no to federal bailouts of States!
The Triple Ten Plan
1. an immediate 10% cut in staffing levels of all government agencies.
2. An immediate across the board 10% cut in pay, benefits, and retirement for all federal, state, and local government employees. No exceptions.
3. An immediate non-negotiable manditory increase in the productivity of all government employees. If you fail to perform at the new level, you will be replaced by an immigrant worker, legal or not.

A government that is big enough to give you everything you want, is a government big enough to take everything you have.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top