Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
domestic energy resources have cost the US. For years, the democrats have said NO to off-shore drilling, NO to nuclear power, NO to drilling in ANWR, NO to extracting Colorado shale and just recently, NO to Utah oil and gas leases.
They have forced our dependence on foreign sources of oil, putting us at risk to the whims of dictators and tyrants. They are truly crippling this nation with their dangerous, liberal policies. Instead of sending our hard-earned billions to places like Brazil to develop their oil reserves, we should be spending time and money on developing our own. Can you imagine the high paying jobs would be available?
The report, issued today, said opening the areas would free up 43 billion barrels of oil and 286 trillion cubic feet of gas. The U.S. used 22.8 trillion cubic feet of gas and 5.2 billion barrels of oil in 2009, according to a press release issued with the report.
Annual average natural-gas prices will increase by 17 percent by 2030 and electricity prices will rise by 5 percent if U.S. policy makers don’t open access to off-limit areas, the report forecast. That would cut the gross domestic product by $2.36 trillion cumulatively through 2029, or 0.52 percent annually on average, according to the report.
domestic energy resources have cost the US. For years, the democrats have said NO to off-shore drilling, NO to nuclear power, NO to drilling in ANWR, NO to extracting Colorado shale and just recently, NO to Utah oil and gas leases.
They have forced our dependence on foreign sources of oil, putting us at risk to the whims of dictators and tyrants. They are truly crippling this nation with their dangerous, liberal policies.
If we were allowed to drill for our own oil and gas, not only would it create tens of thousands of jobs, but we could prob get all the oil we need from domestic sources, and imports from Canada and Mexico.
February 16, 2010 | 8:57 AM ET President Obama Announces Money for Nuclear Power Plant
Quote:
President Obama is announcing funding to break ground on the first new nuclear power plant in nearly three decades. In Lanham, Maryland Tuesday morning, Mr. Obama will announce the first loan guarantee for the construction and operation of two new nuclear reactors at a Southern Company plant in Burke, Georgia.
President Obama Announces Money for Nuclear Power Plant « Row 2, Seat 4 (http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/02/16/president-obama-announces-loan-for-nuclear-power-plant/ - broken link)
domestic energy resources have cost the US. For years, the democrats have said NO to off-shore drilling, NO to nuclear power, NO to drilling in ANWR, NO to extracting Colorado shale and just recently, NO to Utah oil and gas leases.
They have forced our dependence on foreign sources of oil, putting us at risk to the whims of dictators and tyrants. They are truly crippling this nation with their dangerous, liberal policies. Instead of sending our hard-earned billions to places like Brazil to develop their oil reserves, we should be spending time and money on developing our own. Can you imagine the high paying jobs would be available?
Increased supply does not increase profit.. Does someone really need top explain this to you?
Go have another beer..
Increased DOMESTIC supply sure as sh!+ will increase profit for U.S. companies.... (Or are you suggesting that they're going to do this all out of the goodness of their corporate hearts? )
How 'bout you lay off the Wild Turkey?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.