The NO Party says NO again

[Katarina Witt]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

Yes, ASTRO TURF. It was a booby trap and the boobs offered it.

I'm sorry, Ohio's post is a bold-faced lie. Hillary Clinton did denounce that movie, as I have previously posted. To quote that, and agree with it, is perpetuating that lie. The "left" did denounce it. Maybe it was done for political purposes, as TRUEGRITT says. But she said it.

[TRUEGRITT]

Originally Posted by ♠atizar♠

Yes, especially those bound and determined to prove that the POTUS is not eligible to be POTUS.

No amount of word-salading is going to cover your do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do attitude.

Your post history is much more controversial than mine and you have started dozens and dozens of more threads than I have, most of them political attacks.

Get over yourself. You're no better.

I think the difference is that I questioned (and still do) the eligibility of the POTUS, one person, over one matter, and did not disparage an entire party while doing so...you try to throw a rope around an entire party and hang them all because of the ignorance of a few. In my opinion, I believed I brought up legitimate points for debate while you are just being dishonest with a huge lasso.

Please don't take it personally, you seem to be an intelligent person that has fallen into some bad habits...look at it as "constructive criticism".

[Roadking2003]

Any time Congress does nothing, that's a good thing. I wish they would go on vacation for a year.

Almost everything Congress does has one of three possible outcomes; 1) Increases taxes, 2) increases the size and power of government or 3) reduces personal liberty.