Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a Panthers fan, I don't think ya'll can beat us. Carolina will be on high alert. I think more likely is catching Tennessee or Jacksonville off of their guard.
And Del Rio just got fired. Maybe Caldwell could be next??
Wait a minute, are you saying the Colts are purposely losing so that they can be guaranteed the first pick? I find that hard to believe. But then again, stranger things have happened...
I find it odd that the difference between a playoff run and 0-11 is their injured starting QB. They're completely hapless and it doesn't make sense otherwise.
1976 and 1977 seasons of the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were by far the worst team in NFL history.
Moving on to the Colts:
They will be 1-15 beating the Jaguars (IMO)
I find it odd that the difference between a playoff run and 0-11 is their injured starting QB. They're completely hapless and it doesn't make sense otherwise.
The Colts were not a good team last year; Peyton masked a lot of shortcomings on a team that won a weak division.
I think the display put on by the 2011 Colts is the most disgusting I've ever seen in all my years of watching the NFL. They are absolutely throwing the season for an untested college player. They are allowing RB's to walk into the endzone. I've never seen anything like it.
Nobody thought the Lions could do it in '09, but they did. Who's to say the Colts can't do it too? Granted the '09 Lions were probably the worst team in history, but this year's Colts are pretty bad too.
That was 2008 when the Lions went 0-16. Also during a time when the Ford Motor Company should've gone bankrupt until the goverment bailed them out. I hate Ford now, but the Lions ought to be thinking about winning without Ndamonkung Suh.
As for the Colts, 0-16 is very likely this season since it's proven they can't win a game with out Peyton Manning. He's most likely out for the year.
For the Colts, you know how it goes. Better luck next year. Just hope they don't buy into ESPN's concept of "Suck for Luck."
They are absolutely throwing the season for an untested college player. They are allowing RB's to walk into the endzone. I've never seen anything like it.
When did they allow a running back to walk into the end zone?
The Colts were not a good team last year; Peyton masked a lot of shortcomings on a team that won a weak division.
They went 10-6 in 2010 and lost by a field goal in OT to Dallas, by three points to New England in Boston and by two points to the Eagles in Philly... which is very close to 13-3. The QB can't mask the running game, offensive line, special teams and defense to the point where the team wins 10 games versus going winless. The team is clearly positioning itself for the number one draft pick and should be interesting to see how they fare next year. If there's a huge turnaround in 2012 we'll know..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
