Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2016, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,836,946 times
Reputation: 21848

Advertisements

The 'dog situation' in our Condo has gotten out of control. The HOA is attempting to regain control over the dog situation (number, size, nuisance, noise, etc). While the plan is to 'grandfather-in' all existing pets (including those of renters), one aspect of the plan is to rule-out dogs for new renters.

It's been suggested that Florida law/statutes might prevent that, but, since many Condos already make that distinction, I'm thinking the HOA is well within our rights.

Any experience or recommendations in this area? (Thanks)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2016, 08:13 AM
 
11,411 posts, read 7,809,020 times
Reputation: 21923
Quote:
Originally Posted by jghorton View Post
The 'dog situation' in our Condo has gotten out of control. The HOA is attempting to regain control over the dog situation (number, size, nuisance, noise, etc). While the plan is to 'grandfather-in' all existing pets (including those of renters), one aspect of the plan is to rule-out dogs for new renters.

It's been suggested that Florida law/statutes might prevent that, but, since many Condos already make that distinction, I'm thinking the HOA is well within our rights.

Any experience or recommendations in this area? (Thanks)

We added a bunch of rental restrictions (via community vote) a few years ago. We wanted to add verbiage to require a credit report, background check and disallow pets for renters. Our HOA attorney told us those items were beyond the scope of the HOA and had to be left in the hands of the owner.


Our CC&Rs allow for 2 pets per household and renters are subject to this UNLESS the owner of the property has other restrictions they impose. As an HOA, we cannot distinguish between owners and renters as far as the CC&Rs are concerned. Everyone is subject to the exact same rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 08:13 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,224,257 times
Reputation: 18170
It's a losing battle. By grandfathering existing pets they are essentially locking in and condoning the current "out of control" situation. Future renters pets are in no way contributing to your problem. I'm guessing from the tone of the post that enforcing the current rules is not an option. I feel for you. Prepare to be labeled a dog hater if you are on the side of enforcement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 08:42 AM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,021,941 times
Reputation: 29935
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1insider View Post
It's a losing battle. By grandfathering existing pets they are essentially locking in and condoning the current "out of control" situation. Future renters pets are in no way contributing to your problem. I'm guessing from the tone of the post that enforcing the current rules is not an option. I feel for you. Prepare to be labeled a dog hater if you are on the side of enforcement.

They have no choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
5,662 posts, read 10,745,652 times
Reputation: 6950
First, let's distinguish between HOAs and COAs or condo associations. They are not the same and the condo association has more control (at least in theory) over the property.

I am not an attorney but speaking as a board member for a condo, I believe you are right that any changes made will not apply to the current owners (and tenants since they already have existing rights via their leases) but the new rules would apply to new purchasers and tenants and, over time and attrition, the total number of pets will go down. We have the same problem here with owners not picking up after their pets and it really upsets some people who look to the board and expect us to do something. Since no one wants to be on a fining committee, though, we are pretty much powerless to do anything except send letters.

Honestly, I think the only thing that will work is a campaign of peer pressure and outing offenders as slobs. I'm not sure how that might work but I think it would have an impact if people knew they were being watched and they knew they'd be pegged publicly if they just walk away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 12:39 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,021,941 times
Reputation: 29935
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbronston View Post
I am not an attorney but speaking as a board member for a condo, I believe you are right that any changes made will not apply to the current owners (and tenants since they already have existing rights via their leases)...
Yes, I posted that this morning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbronston View Post
... no one wants to be on a fining committee, though, we are pretty much powerless to do anything except send letters.
If they don't want to work to resolve the problem, you should tell them to quit whining about it. We had a similar problem last year regarding rules violations (albeit not about pets). We formed a Grievance (fining) Committee to address the issues and the problems went away after a few months and more than a few fines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 01:03 PM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,224,257 times
Reputation: 18170
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
They have no choice.
If assuming that the current rules don't prohibit pets. If the current problem dogs are in violation of existing rules, they have the option of trying to enforce what they haven't been enforcing prior. It's a no win situation from my experience.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 02:30 PM
 
11,177 posts, read 16,021,941 times
Reputation: 29935
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1insider View Post
If assuming that the current rules don't prohibit pets. If the current problem dogs are in violation of existing rules, they have the option of trying to enforce what they haven't been enforcing prior. It's a no win situation from my experience.

That's a completely different point from the one I was making, which is that the pets of current owners and tenants are protected (grandfathered) from any proposed change in COA regulations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 02:34 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,650 posts, read 48,053,996 times
Reputation: 78432
You really need to pay for a consultation with a local real estate specialist lawyer. If he thinks it is legal, pay him to draft the rule for you.

If you are going to do something that might get you sued, you don't want to take your legal advice from strangers on the internet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
5,662 posts, read 10,745,652 times
Reputation: 6950
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadManofBethesda View Post
Yes, I posted that this morning.


If they don't want to work to resolve the problem, you should tell them to quit whining about it. We had a similar problem last year regarding rules violations (albeit not about pets). We formed a Grievance (fining) Committee to address the issues and the problems went away after a few months and more than a few fines.
To be clear, I was agreeing with you on the point. Regarding a fining committee, we can't make people participate in that and telling them to "quit whining" isn't really much of a solution to the problem. They have the right to expect the rules to be enforced (thru the condo docs) but they don't have the obligation (thru the docs) to be part of the enforcement process. That's the problem with the docs. Wouldn't it be great if every owner had a legal obligation to participate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top