Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-31-2016, 04:14 AM
 
1,185 posts, read 1,506,162 times
Reputation: 2297

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
And get paid more when the selling price is higher, even if representing the buyer. "Just sayin."
This.

Most real estate agents I know are right up there with some of the worst lawyers I know when it comes to integrity.

Would you trust a used car salesman with pricing a used car that you're interested in? Or would you trust the industry standard?

Trusting a real estate agent when it comes to pricing is foolish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-31-2016, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Raleigh
13,717 posts, read 12,462,759 times
Reputation: 20227
Quote:
Originally Posted by thealfa View Post
how to find if an auctioned house isn't trashed and has back taxes owed that cost more than the house itself? Is there a "kelley blue book" for houses? So I know if the title is clean and not salvaged (as some cars are known to have a salvaged title, not sure if houses follow the same ways). Should I google the tax and land assessment on the house to find out the gist of the house? While I did see the house from the windows and it looks fine on the surface but I'd be curious if the mechanics of it are working (pipes, drain, sewage, water, electricity, etc.). Electricity I know works because the light is always on the porch so that way no one would break in the house knowing it looks empty.
Buying a house at an auction is kind of like buying a car at an auction. You take a lot more risks, are afforded less due diligence and hope to get a better deal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Austin
455 posts, read 464,711 times
Reputation: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
And get paid more when the selling price is higher, even if representing the buyer. "Just sayin."
Yea, but they don't sell at the higher price. They sit on the market and they get the "WWWTH" disease. (What's wrong with that house?") Generally speaking, the first two weeks of a home being on the market are the best. If it is competitively priced in a warm or hot market, it should sell by then. Keyword: "Competitively priced."

You seem to forget that buyer's agents are also realtors and they will not encourage their buyers to buy an over priced house. In fact, for those financing, those homes may have been priced above the search criteria.

Overprice a house by $10K and it will most likely sit there or attract offers well below the list price. If the house is overpriced by $10K and it sells, the Realtors would each make a whopping $300 each if commissions are 3% for each. The extra time it's on the market will cost the agent more in terms of wasted time and marketing budget.

Nearly all Realtors would rather price it accurately and sell it in a few days, then go on to the next house.

Now, are houses overpriced? All the time, but that's not the motive. It's the seller insisting on a higher price (which is why you'll see the price reduced two weeks later because there's no traffic. Or, it's the inexperience of the agent, especially if there are few or no comps. Or the agent wants to get leads off of his/her yard sign.

The majority of agents I know and have done deals with would rather price it right, sell it and move on to the next. Buyers agents are the same way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,538 posts, read 12,171,963 times
Reputation: 39156
Quote:
Originally Posted by kokonutty View Post
And get paid more when the selling price is higher, even if representing the buyer. "Just sayin."
If the house sells at that price, it's not too high. It's the right price. That is the definition of market value.

If a house is overpriced it doesn't sell. Or if a buyer does want it, it fails in appraisal. If we overprice a house, we have to fool a lot of people to actually get that price.... Not just buyers... other realtors, the appraiser, the bank...

In my experience it is sellers, not realtors, who tend to overprice houses. They've got an idea what they want or need to get out of the house, and they don't want to leave money on the table. I don't blame them... But... The only value that matters is what others value the home at... not the seller... not the seller's realtor.

Most realtors would usually much rather have right-priced listings that sell in days, than overpriced ones that sit on the market months, continuing to cost money in time and advertisement. Yes, really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 11:01 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,433,309 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diana Holbrook View Post
If the house sells at that price, it's not too high. It's the right price. That is the definition of market value.

If a house is overpriced it doesn't sell. Or if a buyer does want it, it fails in appraisal. If we overprice a house, we have to fool a lot of people to actually get that price.... Not just buyers... other realtors, the appraiser, the bank...

In my experience it is sellers, not realtors, who tend to overprice houses. They've got an idea what they want or need to get out of the house, and they don't want to leave money on the table. I don't blame them... But... The only value that matters is what others value the home at... not the seller... not the seller's realtor.

Most realtors would usually much rather have right-priced listings that sell in days, than overpriced ones that sit on the market months, continuing to cost money in time and advertisement. Yes, really.
Buyers can be talked or pressured into paying a higher price, thats not market value. Its in the best interest of the realtor to sell at a higher price. You can talk integrity all day long but if there is a systemic best interests issue then you can only justify YOUR OWN ethics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 01:26 PM
 
11,025 posts, read 7,855,356 times
Reputation: 23702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ross View Post
Yea, but they don't sell at the higher price. They sit on the market and they get the "WWWTH" disease. (What's wrong with that house?") Generally speaking, the first two weeks of a home being on the market are the best. If it is competitively priced in a warm or hot market, it should sell by then. Keyword: "Competitively priced."

You seem to forget that buyer's agents are also realtors and they will not encourage their buyers to buy an over priced house. In fact, for those financing, those homes may have been priced above the search criteria.

Overprice a house by $10K and it will most likely sit there or attract offers well below the list price. If the house is overpriced by $10K and it sells, the Realtors would each make a whopping $300 each if commissions are 3% for each. The extra time it's on the market will cost the agent more in terms of wasted time and marketing budget.

Nearly all Realtors would rather price it accurately and sell it in a few days, then go on to the next house.

Now, are houses overpriced? All the time, but that's not the motive. It's the seller insisting on a higher price (which is why you'll see the price reduced two weeks later because there's no traffic. Or, it's the inexperience of the agent, especially if there are few or no comps. Or the agent wants to get leads off of his/her yard sign.

The majority of agents I know and have done deals with would rather price it right, sell it and move on to the next. Buyers agents are the same way.
The bolded is a sweeping, idealistic comment. The buyer's agent does not get paid if the house is not sold but takes money out of his own pocket if he negotiates a lower price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Rochester, WA
14,538 posts, read 12,171,963 times
Reputation: 39156
Market value is what buyers want to pay and sellers will accept. Backed by others who also have to agree, like lenders and their appraisers. It's not ethics as much as it is being practical. Over-pricing listings will make a realtor go broke. We make nothing if no one wants to buy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Lakewood Ranch, FL
5,662 posts, read 10,755,380 times
Reputation: 6950
Another aspect to this "agents are only out for themselves" argument is the appraisal. I've yet to meet a buyer with cash who wanted to pay more than the last comp and none of them want to pay the asking price or take an agent's opinion on the price (and they shouldn't.) They want to see the data and, in many cases, they want to see where the data come from. So, for cash buyers, this scenario doesn't exist.

For buyers who are using a loan, the property pretty much still needs to appraise and the agent has nothing to do with the appraiser's valuation although agents can make suggestions on comps and provide detailed information that might not be readily available to the appraiser. So, again, for borrowers, there is another check and balance.

Finally, all the nay-sayers can continue to believe what they like but agents survive on referrals. Getting people to sell for too little or pay too much isn't a very successful way of obtaining referrals. A new agent might try that but not for long; an experienced agent understands and sees the big long-term picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Austin
455 posts, read 464,711 times
Reputation: 625
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbronston View Post
Another aspect to this "agents are only out for themselves" argument is the appraisal. I've yet to meet a buyer with cash who wanted to pay more than the last comp and none of them want to pay the asking price or take an agent's opinion on the price (and they shouldn't.) They want to see the data and, in many cases, they want to see where the data come from. So, for cash buyers, this scenario doesn't exist.

For buyers who are using a loan, the property pretty much still needs to appraise and the agent has nothing to do with the appraiser's valuation although agents can make suggestions on comps and provide detailed information that might not be readily available to the appraiser. So, again, for borrowers, there is another check and balance.

Finally, all the nay-sayers can continue to believe what they like but agents survive on referrals. Getting people to sell for too little or pay too much isn't a very successful way of obtaining referrals. A new agent might try that but not for long; an experienced agent understands and sees the big long-term picture.
Exactly!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2016, 02:16 PM
 
3,493 posts, read 3,209,594 times
Reputation: 6523
No. No such thing.


Recent auction of house seized for non-payment of taxes just got "market" value (auctions sure can be useless if you're thinking "bargain."). I know from the locals (but not known to bidders) that $5400 of back association fees are owed and due upon occupancy. Utilities won't be reconnected if association fees are not paid. Also, I know personally, the A/C is non-operable (hasn't been for years), and a water flood (a few years ago) has wrecked much of the subfloor. There is over $10,000 of stuff to be paid above the auction price. But the place was locked up. Nobody allowed inside. Somebody, probably unknowingly, got a lemon.


Be careful with these auctions. This place went for at least $25,000 above what it's actually worth.

Last edited by TwinbrookNine; 05-31-2016 at 02:58 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top