Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-12-2016, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,219,950 times
Reputation: 38267

Advertisements

This is just one person's opinion, of course, but I found it quite interesting with the photographic examples.

Quote:
Sometimes people ask, why is xyz house bad? Asking this question does not imply that the asker has bad taste or no taste whatsoever - it means that they are simply not educated in basic architectural concepts. In this post, I will introduce basic architectural concepts and explain why not all suburban/exurban/residential houses are McMansions, as well as what makes a McMansion especially hideous.
McMansions 101: What Makes a McMansion Bad Architecture?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:21 AM
 
9,868 posts, read 7,707,756 times
Reputation: 22124
That article defines McMansion as having bad architecture.

Most times I have heard the term the speaker is referring mainly to the size, and often its use of designs that clash with other houses nearby.

There are huge houses that are beautiful, and there are small or tiny houses that are ugly.

Some tiny houses could be described as Junior Whopper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:26 AM
 
4,565 posts, read 10,659,872 times
Reputation: 6730
A house is like art....... if you love it....... that is all that matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Arizona
8,272 posts, read 8,660,299 times
Reputation: 27675
I usually hear McMansions used by the people that can't afford one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Denver CO
24,201 posts, read 19,219,950 times
Reputation: 38267
Quote:
Originally Posted by 399083453 View Post
A house is like art....... if you love it....... that is all that matters.
True, but I found it a helpful explanation for why many people find McMansions unattractive, or at least some of the stereotypical versions. I could have pointed out balance/symmetry and proportions as specific issues, but I wouldn't have been able to identify the masses and voids so specifically even though those are characteristics that IMO contribute to many of these houses being aesthetically unappealing. There are also plenty of houses that might be called McMansions based on size, but which still can be quite attractive because they don't have the kinds of issues described in the piece.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Raleigh
13,713 posts, read 12,443,102 times
Reputation: 20227
What makes a McMansion Bad Architecture? The inability to afford it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:30 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,225,683 times
Reputation: 57825
Hmm, I find the McMansions shown in the article to be far more attractive than the boring, symetrical, homes they are promoting (which look a lot like mine). In fact, those homes with the masses and voids are very popular now, with many new developments selling quickly at over $1 million, and they are not McMansions, just 4,000 sf tract homes on 5-6,000 sf lots.

Discovery Grove | Sammamish WA New Homes | American Classic Homes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:54 AM
 
54 posts, read 77,113 times
Reputation: 91
"What makes a McMansion Bad Architecture? The inability to afford it."

Ha, spoken like a true prole. But I mean it in a good way believe it or not.
But realistically, folks, there will always be some people who grow up with the financial security, cultural exposure, and for lack of a better term, good breeding, that it takes to distinguish good taste from bad. I kid you not, having grown up in a wealthy suburb of DC I got to the point where I could tell quite a bit about a person's life history merely from looking at the house they live in. For example I know a guy who is a VP of a big financial services company, Presbyterian of course, and grew up in the same suburbs of DC. He now lives in North Carolina. He could have afforded a big hideous McMansion, but someone with background chose a more "modest", classier looking place among the city's older housing stock. New money usually doesn't have good taste because they didn't have time to develop it. They were too busy becoming new money...which is fine, I'm not saying those people are better or worse than anyone else. I don't think people with "good taste" are superior people...sometimes I find them insufferable (including the guy I mentioned who is a friend of the family, not a friend). But that they have good taste is an actual fact and reality, just like some people are tall and some people are short.
Even if you look at celebrities and denizens of Hollywood, the ones from old money background, such as it were...often live in a way that is indicative of that background.

BTW though that tumblr post is actually one of the best I've seen that actually breaks down why McMansion architecture is often hideous. Kudos to the writer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:07 PM
gg
 
Location: Pittsburgh
26,137 posts, read 25,987,872 times
Reputation: 17378
I agree with the article and can afford one of those ugly things, but people buy them and like them, so that is all that really matters. Personal tastes differ. All the homes I have owned were older classic homes that I updated in a tasteful manner and in keeping with its architecture. I have been in the real estate business for over 20 years, so that may make a difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:43 PM
 
965 posts, read 939,410 times
Reputation: 1933
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZigZagBoom View Post
"What makes a McMansion Bad Architecture? The inability to afford it."

Ha, spoken like a true prole. But I mean it in a good way believe it or not.
But realistically, folks, there will always be some people who grow up with the financial security, cultural exposure, and for lack of a better term, good breeding, that it takes to distinguish good taste from bad. I kid you not, having grown up in a wealthy suburb of DC I got to the point where I could tell quite a bit about a person's life history merely from looking at the house they live in. For example I know a guy who is a VP of a big financial services company, Presbyterian of course, and grew up in the same suburbs of DC. He now lives in North Carolina. He could have afforded a big hideous McMansion, but someone with background chose a more "modest", classier looking place among the city's older housing stock. New money usually doesn't have good taste because they didn't have time to develop it. They were too busy becoming new money...which is fine, I'm not saying those people are better or worse than anyone else. I don't think people with "good taste" are superior people...sometimes I find them insufferable (including the guy I mentioned who is a friend of the family, not a friend). But that they have good taste is an actual fact and reality, just like some people are tall and some people are short.
Even if you look at celebrities and denizens of Hollywood, the ones from old money background, such as it were...often live in a way that is indicative of that background.

BTW though that tumblr post is actually one of the best I've seen that actually breaks down why McMansion architecture is often hideous. Kudos to the writer.
^^^ this! Absolutely. I see McMs as conspicuous consumption. And yes I could probably afford one, but choose not to. I have not yet seen one that didn't have to be updated within 10 years (sometimes less) because it was falling apart due to shoddy builders.
Quite a lot more people could afford them if keeping up with the Jones was more important to them than savings for retirement, having a second home, paying off credit cards monthly, etc...

I guess I should read the article now
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top