Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Virginia
2,765 posts, read 3,634,679 times
Reputation: 2355

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
Seriously. And people wonder why women feel objectified.

The real question is: why do any men ever have relationships with women if they can just buy what they want?
Women are objectified because their own gender willingly and gladly allows them to be objectified just look at car magazines and Magazines like Playboy and Maxim just to name a few, Victoria's Secret store fronts and tv shows. As far as men being able to "buy what they want" well that is the thing, it is just not that simple, the law prohibits paying for sex and that brings the element of risk of prosecution and public embarassment into the picture which probably keeps a lot of men from doing it but if it wasn't like that there would probably be less relationships.

Last edited by 1orlando; 08-22-2014 at 11:23 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:29 PM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,151,564 times
Reputation: 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1orlando View Post
Women are objectified because their own gender willingly and gladly allows them to be objectified just look at car magazines and Magazines like Playboy and Maxim just to name a few, Victoria's Secret store fronts and tv shows. As far as men being able to "buy what they want" well that is the thing, it is just not that simple, the law prohibits paying for sex and that brings the element of risk of prosecution and public embarassment into the picture which probably keeps a lot of men from doing it but if it wasn't like that there would probably be less relationships.
That's not why women are objectified - massive oversimplification. That's a RESULT of it. In the context of this thread, I was referring to a different kind anyway.

And men made these laws. Why? Why make laws that prevent you from what you want?
Why have social shame over it? Men set these mores up - not women (we didn't have that power; if any thing, women's lib opened up the door MORE for this sort of thing).

I'm being entirely serious - why have a relationship at all? If this is what most men want, and they act on it, then laws & public opinion will adjust accordingly, because it will be too much of a majority. Why not just do what you want?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:31 PM
 
Location: moved
13,673 posts, read 9,754,531 times
Reputation: 23528
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillabean View Post
Single male friends... yes. Three. One is 10 years younger than me and has a live-in girlfriend. Another is 72-years-old and lives on the opposite coast, and the third is actually the man I dated earlier this year who also lives far away. ...

The vast majority of my friends are my age, in their 30s and 40s and are married.
And this is the central problem! Once we reach a certain age, the vast majority of our social circle becomes married, or at least stably coupled. The exceptions are persons old enough to be our parents (mainly widows and widowers), or young enough to be our children (they are our friends' children) - and both categories are presumably off-limits.

It's hard to understand for members of the college-crowd, who are surrounded by at least hypothetically available people, who those in the older generation simply don't have anyone within their social circle who remains sexually available. At work, nobody is single - not a one. In my meetup.com groups, very very few are single, and those are men (in other words, there are zero single women).

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustJulia View Post
It's often repeated but makes little sense. As if the prostitute really wants to have sex for free and stay afterward for some reason, but the john pays to get her out the door. Sure, the hooker would rather hang out and make him pancakes or something, but he pays her to leave.
The premise of this oft-repeated adage is that the prostitute is no-strings-attached sex. It's anonymous. There are no lasting entanglements, as there potentially would have been, had the sex occurred say between casual acquaintances sharing the same social group.

However, there is a category of men – and presumably a large one! – who crave both sex, and companionship, and partnership, and essentially everything that a normal relationship entails, save perhaps for the nagging and the threat of divorce. Such men would gladly pay for what might be termed a higher form of prostitution, where they enjoy the exclusive and long-term company of the lady.

What I'd dearly like to see legal and legitimized isn't prostitution per se, but a form of employment for women akin to a temp agency. A person can get a regular job, say as clerk - or they can sign up at a temp agency, and the agency will then be hired by regular employers to provide temporary employees when the employer has a temporary surge in business. Along similar lines, the "sexual temp agency" would have women on-call. The client then comes in, and "recruits" them (for a fee, of course), for a set period of time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:38 PM
 
Location: So Cal
52,348 posts, read 52,815,472 times
Reputation: 52836
One time a long time ago I was talking with some co-workers and I was young and fresh faced and wet behind the ears and these guys were older than me and the subject of prostitution came up and one of the guys was a military vet and apparently there are parts of the world you go to and prostitution ain't no thing but a chicken wing according to him anyway.

So we were talking and I ask in all my young earnestness why they'd be interested in paying for sex, cause to me I had some ego in it and I thought, "I ain't going to pay for a woman to have sex with me" ... I was full of the brass ones and expected a woman to "want me"

One of the old timers told me. "I don't pay for sex, I pay them to leave."

For better or worse, that's what he said....... not necessarily my sentiments... but something I've heard straight from the horses mouth... so to speak....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:40 PM
 
Location: Virginia
2,765 posts, read 3,634,679 times
Reputation: 2355
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
That's not why women are objectified - massive oversimplification. That's a RESULT of it. In the context of this thread, I was referring to a different kind anyway.

And men made these laws. Why? Why make laws that prevent you from what you want?
Why have social shame over it? Men set these mores up - not women (we didn't have that power; if any thing, women's lib opened up the door MORE for this sort of thing).

I'm being entirely serious - why have a relationship at all? If this is what most men want, and they act on it, then laws & public opinion will adjust accordingly, because it will be too much of a majority. Why not just do what you want?
Why men made these laws? Well I certainly wasn't one of those men so I don't have the answer for that but I suppose those who did felt that they had the right to tell women what is right for them which I think is wrong. But they certainly were influenced by religious beliefs and all that but that is a different matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:45 PM
 
Location: CA
3,467 posts, read 8,151,564 times
Reputation: 4841
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1orlando View Post
Why men made these laws? Well I certainly wasn't one of those men so I don't have the answer for that but I suppose those who did felt that they had the right to tell women what is right for them which I think is wrong. But they certainly were influenced by religiuos beliefs and all that but that is a different matter.
And where did religious beliefs come from? If you don't believe in it, then they would be man-made also.
Why would men tell women something is right or wrong for them if it doesn't even benefit them (the men)?

There seems to be a chasm between the societies men have built and what they really want. Why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-22-2014, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Virginia
2,765 posts, read 3,634,679 times
Reputation: 2355
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeapple View Post
And where did religious beliefs come from? If you don't believe in it, then they would be man-made also.
Why would men tell women something is right or wrong for them if it doesn't even benefit them (the men)?

There seems to be a chasm between the societies men have built and what they really want. Why?
Once again, I wasn't among those men who built those societies, the thing is that men in power have the ability to control other's lives (to some extent of course) , and some of those men who make those laws are the first one to break them but that is life unfortunately. I am not saying that most men want to pay for sex but many of them do, maybe more than we think but because of the laws that prohibit doing so many do not go for it. As far as why men pay for sex well each man has his own reasons but those who are against prostitution don't want to hear any of it because it doesn't fit their agenda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2014, 01:14 AM
 
4,221 posts, read 4,477,217 times
Reputation: 10201
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohio_peasant View Post
And this is the central problem! Once we reach a certain age, the vast majority of our social circle becomes married, or at least stably coupled. The exceptions are persons old enough to be our parents (mainly widows and widowers), or young enough to be our children (they are our friends' children) - and both categories are presumably off-limits.

It's hard to understand for members of the college-crowd, who are surrounded by at least hypothetically available people, who those in the older generation simply don't have anyone within their social circle who remains sexually available. At work, nobody is single - not a one. In my meetup.com groups, very very few are single, and those are men (in other words, there are zero single women).



The premise of this oft-repeated adage is that the prostitute is no-strings-attached sex. It's anonymous. There are no lasting entanglements, as there potentially would have been, had the sex occurred say between casual acquaintances sharing the same social group.

However, there is a category of men – and presumably a large one! – who crave both sex, and companionship, and partnership, and essentially everything that a normal relationship entails, save perhaps for the nagging and the threat of divorce. Such men would gladly pay for what might be termed a higher form of prostitution, where they enjoy the exclusive and long-term company of the lady.

What I'd dearly like to see legal and legitimized isn't prostitution per se, but a form of employment for women akin to a temp agency. A person can get a regular job, say as clerk - or they can sign up at a temp agency, and the agency will then be hired by regular employers to provide temporary employees when the employer has a temporary surge in business. Along similar lines, the "sexual temp agency" would have women on-call. The client then comes in, and "recruits" them (for a fee, of course), for a set period of time.

Good points ^^. I see an eventual trend to something like the futuristic "Circuit" from the scifi movie Logan's Run. Between all the variants of internet / online attempts to 'provide' a service to meet demand.


Logan's Run (1976 film) Party at Logan's - YouTube

What's most disheartening is the disparity in understanding of each sexes holistic functioning and needs. I've posted the following in various threads about Wilhelm Reich and I think his philosophical and scientific approach / attitude toward understanding human sexuality was much more healthy than what we've ended up with - between religious dogmatic ideas, mass media conditioning, et. al. which, for all intents and purposes, is to either rigidly control or 'manage' humans by their fears, lust, and to be controllable disenchanted consumers who feel they must buy something or some solution to be more 'sexually' desirable.


Who is Afraid of Wilhelm Reich.flv - YouTube

The 25 minutes from 9:00 to 34:00 get to the main concepts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2014, 05:18 AM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
10,379 posts, read 10,939,123 times
Reputation: 18713
Men pay for sex in many ways, other than direct cash payments to prostitutes. Ever seen a 50 year old man with a woman close to his daughters age? It looks more respectable, but in many cases, its just about the same thing. Men pay for sex cause they can't get it free.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2014, 07:33 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 7,210,018 times
Reputation: 7158
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillabean View Post
Single male friends... yes. Three. One is 10 years younger than me and has a live-in girlfriend. Another is 72-years-old and lives on the opposite coast, and the third is actually the man I dated earlier this year who also lives far away. He flaked on me and suddenly cut off things saying he couldn't do a long-distance relationship and he couldn't give me what he thought I needed (even though I never asked for anything so I have no idea what he thinks I "need"). He agreed to stay friends with me though. I've stayed at his house since then when I've been in his town and he's never made a move since... other than giving me a hug and a peck on the cheek. We were friends, dated, and now friends again.

I have four single female friends too. But I don't swing that way.

The vast majority of my friends are my age, in their 30s and 40s and are married.



Jillabean, I'm not saying your married male friends will cheat but looking at the history of the world being in a relationship has never stopped men from getting extra play on the side. And alot of the time it's when another woman approached him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top