Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's no reason why a person has to accept someone else's past interracial dating or threesome having behavior if it goes against their personal values.
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,003,083 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Like Sugar
There's no reason why a person has to accept someone else's past interracial dating or threesome having behavior if it goes against their personal values.
No, they don't, but anyone that thinks someone is degraded, unworthy, or has a value/moral problem because that person dated a person from another race, is indeed a racist and expressing racist values. Free country, people are free to be racists. And they're free to reject a person for any reason they want. Values, even completely messed up ones, are still values people can have.
Just like women writing off someone because of their height even if their a great person? How's that not being a shallow *******? As I said if you have different values than someone else than I don't see how it's wrong for someone to turn them down due to a certain thing their against. Only the hypocritical people I can see them being *******s.
So because many people have different issues...it makes yours okay?
It doesn't work that way. You are still being a judgemental prude.
No, they don't, but anyone that thinks someone is degraded, unworthy, or has a value/moral problem because that person dated a person from another race, is indeed a racist and expressing racist values. Free country, people are free to be racists. And they're free to reject a person for any reason they want. Values, even completely messed up ones, are still values people can have.
Sometimes it can be a racist sentiment but it doesn't have to be. It's not necessarily about thinking that the person has been tarnished. We'll just agree to disagree on this.
If someone has done something in the past, that they have no intention of doing in the future...... you still consider that as a reason to exclude them?
I find that counter-intuitive.
__________________ ____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
So because many people have different issues...it makes yours okay?
It doesn't work that way. You are still being a judgemental prude.
What I was trying to point out is that people turn down others for all types of different reasons since everyone has their own preferences. I disagree completely with women for turning down a man solely just due to his height & I think it's completely shallow. But that's their prerogative. And I'm sure you have preferences that a lot of people would disagree with. So how are you right & everyone else wrong?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
