Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2008, 02:07 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,208,032 times
Reputation: 46685

Advertisements

...And wound up talking to a very prominent divorce attorney in town. She was pretty cotton-picking funny about the subject, but she told me one startling statistic: Divorces are down something like 18% in the past year.

Not because couples are getting along better, mind you, but because their home values have plummeted.

So my question is this: If you wake up one morning and decide to divorce your spouse, wouldn't you rather just take your financial lumps than live with somebody you hated?

And, if you have been one of those people who gutted it out for financial reasons, what was it like? And what was the point where you could finally divorce? I mean, if you were still having marital relations with somebody because you were waiting for your home value to go up, isn't that in effect prostituting oneself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2008, 03:39 PM
 
4 posts, read 7,060 times
Reputation: 10
This is nothing new. It may be more pronounced now due to the economy. But, folks have been weighing the practicalities of divorce, the timing etc, forever. It's a cost benefit thing, apparently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Beautiful New England
2,412 posts, read 7,182,307 times
Reputation: 3073
Quote:
Originally Posted by Butterball View Post
It's a cost benefit thing
Economists have known for decades that marriage is a cost/benefit, minimax thing. (See: Gary Becker and Economic: Gary Stanley Becker Marriage)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 03:45 PM
 
37,653 posts, read 46,084,092 times
Reputation: 57256
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
...And wound up talking to a very prominent divorce attorney in town. She was pretty cotton-picking funny about the subject, but she told me one startling statistic: Divorces are down something like 18% in the past year.

Not because couples are getting along better, mind you, but because their home values have plummeted.

So my question is this: If you wake up one morning and decide to divorce your spouse, wouldn't you rather just take your financial lumps than live with somebody you hated?

And, if you have been one of those people who gutted it out for financial reasons, what was it like? And what was the point where you could finally divorce? I mean, if you were still having marital relations with somebody because you were waiting for your home value to go up, isn't that in effect prostituting oneself?
See...this is just another indicator of the tendency to want to take the easiest path. Yeah...you would think the financial lumps would not matter a bit, but sometimes, (and often I suspect), they are much worse than the issues that the couple is (or isn't) dealing with in the relationship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 03:51 PM
 
4 posts, read 7,060 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by professorsenator View Post
Economists have known for decades that marriage is a cost/benefit, minimax thing. (See: Gary Becker and [URL="http://www.economictheories.org/2008/08/gary-stanley-becker-marriage.html"]Economic: Gary Stanley Becker Marriage[/URL])
Interesting . Makes sense and is consistent with what I have expierienced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 04:12 PM
 
Location: in purgurtory in London
3,722 posts, read 4,314,842 times
Reputation: 1292
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpg35223 View Post
...And wound up talking to a very prominent divorce attorney in town. She was pretty cotton-picking funny about the subject, but she told me one startling statistic: Divorces are down something like 18% in the past year.

Not because couples are getting along better, mind you, but because their home values have plummeted.

So my question is this: If you wake up one morning and decide to divorce your spouse, wouldn't you rather just take your financial lumps than live with somebody you hated?

And, if you have been one of those people who gutted it out for financial reasons, what was it like? And what was the point where you could finally divorce? I mean, if you were still having marital relations with somebody because you were waiting for your home value to go up, isn't that in effect prostituting oneself?
There was a discussion way back in the summer about the same subject on a London talk radio station. I won't say its prostituting oneself when so many marriages are shams anyway, which would render a helluva lot of married women who stay with their spouses ho's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 04:18 PM
 
Location: In a delirium
2,588 posts, read 5,435,121 times
Reputation: 1401
Years ago, one of my closest Russian friends told me it was quite common for couples to get divorced and then continue to live together. They would have loved to move into different places, but they were stuck together for financial and housing shortage reasons. Back in the day, moving around wasn't so easy, either. I imagine things got especially interesting when the former spouses started dating again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Lansing, MI
2,947 posts, read 7,025,489 times
Reputation: 3272
I don't think it would be prostitutioning yourself out. Just because 2 people have called it quits doesn't mean their physical needs go away.

Consider this.. if 2 people are on the path of divorce but cannot do it because of the financial aspects... wouldn't it be better that the keep the physical aspect within rather than seeing physical gradification elsewhere? It would be taking care of a need that BOTH parties have.

And.. never know... if so many couples are kept in their marriage because of the economy, maybe it creates a gateway for "working things out."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 06:33 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,208,032 times
Reputation: 46685
Quote:
Originally Posted by chance2jump View Post
I don't think it would be prostitutioning yourself out. Just because 2 people have called it quits doesn't mean their physical needs go away.

Consider this.. if 2 people are on the path of divorce but cannot do it because of the financial aspects... wouldn't it be better that the keep the physical aspect within rather than seeing physical gradification elsewhere? It would be taking care of a need that BOTH parties have.

And.. never know... if so many couples are kept in their marriage because of the economy, maybe it creates a gateway for "working things out."
Yeah, but when you boil it down to its essence, that means you're sharing a marital bed and still doing the humpalumpadingdong for the sake of the money involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2008, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Wyoming
9,724 posts, read 21,254,928 times
Reputation: 14823
Well, money was one of the main considerations I had, right behind the kids, before I finally left my first wife. I had just sold my business interests for big dollars when things really went south. I hated to give up half of that. So I stuck it out for 10 years, until the kids were in college, and gave up ALL of it!

But I wasn't "still doing the humpalumpadingdong for the sake of the money involved," because I wasn't doing the humpalumpadingdong at all!

On Edit: Yeah, I probably should have left her 10 years sooner, but I stayed mainly for the kids. It would have been hard to leave them. But it was hell staying. I'm a person who needs to feel loved, and I wasn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top