Sexual compatibility preferences....

[Sunflower_lol]

Originally Posted by Kishka

The first thought I had was maybe the OP has issues with performance anxiety and thinks being with an 'experienced' man will highlight her lack of experience. When two people truly love and care for each other sex can be a highly spiritual connection that has NOTHING to do with who came before...

I want to feel special. What's wrong with that?
As for inexperienced, no I'm not a virgin (only 1 for me) but don't think there's anything wrong with looking for a man compatible to me in that area.

[BECLAZONE]

Originally Posted by Sunflower_lol

I was wondering if there are more people who have preferences in terms of whether too many partners vs super low number or none would be a deal-breaker.
I'm seeking a man with few (8 or less depending on the age) or no partners, one that is similar to me in that area. I can't relate to those with too many history. I don't know but is it wrong for me to simply want to feel special and not just ''his 20th + girl'' and I'm not interest in reformed men who used to be studs in their early years but now settled down.

I know some people are into ''the past is the past, as long as he/she cares about you'' but I don't know. The past does matter esp. when dealing with compatibility.

Too many would be a deal breaker.
The past is never the past, it can come back to haunt you.

[wanderlust76]

Originally Posted by thriftylefty

IMO delving into a partners sexual history is a black hole you can't return from. Outside of the issues of a persons safe sex behavior , fidelity, likes and dislikes, everything else is risky to know about. If you you are thinking long term.

That's just your opinion of course. To some people including myself it's just as normal as any other discussion you might have with someone you're considering as a long term partner.