Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
May there always be mysteries to solve and curiousity to drive us to find, and solve them.
reminds me of Higgs particle. Many of us were kind of hoping they wouldn't find it. But all is not lost, we have no idea how, or why, women do what women do. That's leaves 90% of the universe still unknown .
reminds me of Higgs particle. Many of us were kind of hoping they wouldn't find it. But all is not lost, we have no idea how, or why, women do what women do. That's leaves 90% of the universe still unknown .
I do, but I'm not telling. So do you when you suggest that their actions are 90% of the universe.
But as you say, Shirina, just have God magically suspend all the pysical laws he made in the first place and do it by Magic.
In which case - again; why the need for a flood at all?
Last edited by TRANSPONDER; 05-10-2015 at 06:37 AM..
I did check to see which species these forebears or foreapes were and for that time scale it would all fall within Homo sapiens, after the appearance of Homo Habilis. The earlier subspecies or ancestral lines of humans were - earlier.
Her mtDNA was derived from earlier species. The line continues back. She is thought to have lived between 50000-500000 years ago.
Nice range there. So the lower paleolithic. But the mtDNA would have come from before that even. Like the scientists stated even from a different species. A fish perhaps.
The OP is correct. In fact the closest "ancestor" that is even possible would be the Neanderthal, but recent studies show humans had no relations with them either. The Neanderthal is more closely related to the chimp than the human.
No, God is not a fish. We were made in God's image. It is massively incorrect to even think humans could come from fish. Such great changes would have killed off the animal that would have come from the fish. The coding just would never allow such strange changes. It would result in sterility.
The OP is correct. In fact the closest "ancestor" that is even possible would be the Neanderthal, but recent studies show humans had no relations with them either. The Neanderthal is more closely related to the chimp than the human.
No, God is not a fish. We were made in God's image. It is massively incorrect to even think humans could come from fish. Such great changes would have killed off the animal that would have come from the fish. The coding just would never allow such strange changes. It would result in sterility.
The OP is correct. In fact the closest "ancestor" that is even possible would be the Neanderthal, but recent studies show humans had no relations with them either.
Ah Eusebius . . . your lack of knowledge is so frustrating. If you are NOT black African or Sub-Saharan African you most likely have between 1-3% of Neanderthal DNA in your genome. Our ancestors definitely had relations with them.
The OP is correct. In fact the closest "ancestor" that is even possible would be the Neanderthal, but recent studies show humans had no relations with them either. The Neanderthal is more closely related to the chimp than the human.
No, God is not a fish. We were made in God's image. It is massively incorrect to even think humans could come from fish. Such great changes would have killed off the animal that would have come from the fish. The coding just would never allow such strange changes. It would result in sterility.
God was no where in the study. As usual he was nowhere at all. The possibility of fish was in fact mentioned.
Ah Eusebius . . . your lack of knowledge is so frustrating. If you are NOT black African or Sub-Saharan African you most likely have between 1-3% of Neanderthal DNA in your genome. Our ancestors definitely had relations with them.
They did indeed. This accounts for some of the racial differences.
I do, but I'm not telling. So do you when you suggest that their actions are 90% of the universe.
What's hers is hers and what's mine is most of hers.
I thought that was common knowledge.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do, but I'm not telling. So do you when you suggest that their actions are 90% of the universe.
