Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1- The results of the double slit experiment make no sense if reality is objective without relying on magical particles that change back and forth into waves depending on how we observe them, or not.
2- The fastest path movement of light, if light were physical, requires photons to be sentient.
3- Quantum tunneling demonstrates that matter only probably exists until measured. Impenetrable barriers that nonetheless allow a few particles to escape show their location is calculated and probabilistic, not material and objective.
1) Some think that particle/wave duality is an illusion:
1- The results of the double slit experiment make no sense if reality is objective without relying on magical particles that change back and forth into waves depending on how we observe them, or not.
2- The fastest path movement of light, if light were physical, requires photons to be sentient.
3- Quantum tunneling demonstrates that matter only probably exists until measured. Impenetrable barriers that nonetheless allow a few particles to escape show their location is calculated and probabilistic, not material and objective.
I see various theories for the above, but none that say we are living in some kind of matrix, and nothing is real.... Wave
Erm, no, what they do is quote mine people who have actually done the work (they never produce original scientific research - how could they? They don't understand the scientific process), taking their words out of context, and misrepresenting what science actually has to say. That is not how science is done.
It is really simple, a person can say "God" made this or that happen, then after millions of years(yes I believe in the scientific time-frame), made this happen, or created a situation where it would happen as time progressed.
Again too many are stuck on the "six days" to mean six earth days as we know them.
It is really simple, a person can say "God" made this or that happen, then after millions of years(yes I believe in the scientific time-frame), made this happen, or created a situation where it would happen as time progressed.
Again too many are stuck on the "six days" to mean six earth days as we know them.
You can say "god did it" with regard to anything, but that neither makes it true nor does it explain anything.
Not really. Nature exists. We have evidence of what nature does. The same cannot be said with regard to God.
I can claim existence in the name of God and say the same thing about God . . . since there is no explanation of what this "Nature" is that you claim existence in the name of.
Careful, atheists who use sarcasm get their posts deleted.
I have had plenty of sarcastic posts deleted...........
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
